Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=126 Randomized Treatment

Comparative Clinical Evaluation of Daily Disposable Lenses in Symptomatic Lens Wearers

Myopia

Enrolled (actual)
126
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Nov 2010
Primary outcome: Primary: Lens Awareness — 16; 12; 11; 9 Participants

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Nelfilcon A contact lens (Device); Narafilcon A contact lens (Device); Etafilcon A contact lens (Device); Omafilcon A contact lens (Device); Hilafilcon B contact lens (Device)
Age
Pediatric, Adult, Older Adult
Sex
All
Sponsor
CIBA VISION
Primary completion
Sep 2009

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Lens Awareness
16; 12; 11; 9; 13

Summary

The purpose of this trial is to evaluate the extent to which symptoms improve in symptomatic contact lens wearers when fit with one of 5 different daily disposable contact lenses.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Currently wear spherical, soft contact lenses replaced at intervals of 2 weeks or monthly.
  • Habitually wear lenses for at least 8 hours per day, 4 days per week, for at least the past 6 months.
  • Report 2 or more qualifying symptoms with current contact lenses with a frequency of "frequently" or "all the time"
  • Able to achieve VA of at least 20/40 in each eye with habitual correction and with study lenses at dispense.
  • Other protocol inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Eye injury or surgery within twelve weeks immediately prior to enrollment.
  • Currently enrolled in any clinical trial.
  • Any use of medications for which contact lens wear could be contraindicated as determined by the investigator.
  • History of corneal refractive surgery.
  • Cylinder correction greater than 1.00 D.
  • Current monovision contact lens wearers.
  • Other protocol inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply.
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00953407). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search