Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 3 N=645 Randomized Quadruple-blind Treatment

NUCYNTA (Tapentadol Immediate Release) Versus Oxycodone Immediate Release in the Treatment of Acute Low Back Pain

Pain · Back Pain · Low Back Pain · Back Pain With Radiation

Enrolled (actual)
645
Serious AEs
0.8%
Results posted
Feb 2012
Primary outcome: Primary: Sum of Pain Intensity Difference (SPID) for Low Back Pain - Summary Statistics at 120 Hours (With Imputation) — 264.6; 264.0 Units on a scale — p=0.9703

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Interventions
NUCYNTA (Drug); Oxycodone IR (Drug)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Ortho-McNeil Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC
Primary completion
Dec 2010

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Sum of Pain Intensity Difference (SPID) for Low Back Pain - Summary Statistics at 120 Hours (With Imputation)
264.6; 264.0 0.9703
SECONDARY
Sum of Pain Intensity Difference (SPID) for Low Back Pain - Summary Statistics at 2 Days (With Imputation)
80.1; 81.8 0.7691
SECONDARY
SPID for Low Back Pain - Summary Statistics at 3 Days (With Imputation)
137.2; 138.1 0.9282
SECONDARY
SPID for Low Back Pain - Summary Statistics at 10 Days (With Imputation)
540.2; 538.6 0.9562
SECONDARY
SPID for Index Leg Pain - Summary Statistics at 2 Days (With Imputation)
73.6; 72.1 0.7973
SECONDARY
SPID for Index Leg Pain - Summary Statistics at 3 Days (With Imputation)
125.5; 123.0 0.7882
SECONDARY
SPID for Index Leg Pain - Summary Statistics at 5 Days (With Imputation)
239.2; 234.1 0.7491
SECONDARY
SPID for Index Leg Pain - Summary Statistics at 10 Days (With Imputation)
488.0; 476.4 0.6897
SECONDARY
Total Pain Relief (TOTPAR) for Low Back Pain - Summary Statistics at 5 Days
254.8; 256.4 0.8226
SECONDARY
SF-MPQ-2 - Change From Baseline Values: Subscale and Total Scores - Continuous Pain Day 5
-2.4; -2.4 0.8880
SECONDARY
SF-MPQ-2 - Change From Baseline Values: Subscale and Total Scores - Continuous Pain Day 10/Last Visit
-3.1; -2.9 0.4115
SECONDARY
SF-MPQ-2 - Change From Baseline Values: Subscale and Total Scores - Intermittent Pain Day 5
-2.6; -2.5 0.8495
SECONDARY
SF-MPQ-2 - Change From Baseline Values: Subscale and Total Scores - Intermittent Pain Day 10/Last Visit
-3.3; -3.2 0.7846
SECONDARY
SF-MPQ-2 - Change From Baseline Values: Subscale and Total Scores - Neuropathic Pain Day 5
-1.5; -1.4 0.4790
SECONDARY
SF-MPQ-2 - Change From Baseline Values: Subscale and Total Scores - Neuropathic Pain Day 10/Last Visit
-1.8; -1.6 0.3147
SECONDARY
SF-MPQ-2 - Change From Baseline Values: Subscale and Total Scores - Affective Descriptors Day 5
-2.0; -1.9 0.5411
SECONDARY
SF-MPQ-2 - Change From Baseline Values: Subscale and Total Scores - Affective Descriptors Day 10/Last Visit
-2.4; -2.2 0.6137
SECONDARY
SF-MPQ-2 - Change From Baseline Values: Subscale and Total Scores - Total Score Day 5
-2.2; -2.1 0.7246
SECONDARY
SF-MPQ-2 - Change From Baseline Values: Subscale and Total Scores - Total Score Day 10/Last Visit
-2.7; -2.5 0.4882
SECONDARY
Patient Global Impression of Change at End of Study
2.1; 2.1
SECONDARY
Patient Global Impression of Change at End of Study
2.1; 2.1
SECONDARY
Clinician Global Impression of Change at End of Study
2.1; 2.1
SECONDARY
Satisfaction With Treatment at Day 5
2.0; 2.0
SECONDARY
Satisfaction With Treatment at End of Study
2.0; 2.0
SECONDARY
Incidence of 30% Responders Without Nausea or Vomiting at Day 5
117; 104 0.1454
SECONDARY
Incidence of 50% Responders Without Nausea or Vomiting at Day 5
72; 60 0.1541
SECONDARY
Summary of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Study Drug Discontinuation
21; 26; 1; 0; 1; 0
SECONDARY
Summary of Subjects Having Nausea as a Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event
51; 67
SECONDARY
Summary of Subjects Having Vomiting as a Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event
51; 80
SECONDARY
Summary of Subjects Having Constipation as a Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event
7; 23
SECONDARY
Summary of Subjects Having Pruritus as a Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event
27; 26
SECONDARY
Kaplan-Meier First Time to 30% Response From Baseline for Low Back Pain
42.93; 44.27 0.5828
SECONDARY
Kaplan-Meier First Time to 50% Response From Baseline for Low Back Pain
92.05; 107.45 0.9084

Summary

Evaluate how NUCYNTA (tapentadol) immediate release (IR) compares with oxycodone IR in the treatment of acute low back pain.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • At Visit 1 (study entry) patients must have a medical history and physical and neurological examinations that support a clinical diagnosis of acute low back pain that is felt down to the lower leg below the knee with the onset no longer than 30 days before Visit 1
  • At Visit 1 patients must report qualifying pain intensity scores
  • Patients must be appropriate candidates for treatment with oral opioid pain medication in the investigator's clinical judgment
  • Patients must be able to appropriately verbalize pain characteristics and to complete all protocol required measurements/assessments without assistance
  • Patients must be medically stable on the basis of physical examination, medical history, vital signs, and clinical laboratory tests performed at screening

Exclusion Criteria

  • History of back (cervical, thoracic or lumbosacral) pain =50% of the time in the 1 year prior to the first visit
  • History of any low back pain episode, with the exception of the current acute low back pain episode, within 3 months prior to the first visit that was greater than mild in pain intensity, or was associated with disability (e.g., loss of time from work, family, or activities of daily living), or necessitated the use of an opioid (narcotic) analgesic including tramadol
  • Medical history or physical examination results that suggest the acute low back pain or any of the neurological symptoms or signs are caused by a serious medical condition (e.g., fever, chills, unexplained weight loss, bowel or urinary bladder dysfunction or incontinence, bilateral leg weakness, progressive weakness, paralysis)
  • There is a high probability for surgical intervention for the back pain during the projected time on the study or that there will be an increase in the severity of the leg pain or deficits
  • Had either a surgical procedure involving the spine or intervertebral discs in the lower back region within 1 year prior to Visit 1 or had >1 surgical procedure(s) involving the spine or intervertebral discs in the lower back region
  • has any painful condition that could interfere with the study assessments or with the patient's ability to differentiate the pain associated with the acute low back pain episode from pain associated with another condition
  • History of severe lumbar spinal stenosis, fibromyalgia, or ankylosing spondylitis
  • history of epilepsy or recurrent seizures
  • Unable or unwilling to discontinue all prohibited medications at the time of randomization and during the time of their participation in the study
  • Known or suspected history of alcohol or drug abuse based on medical history, physical examination, urine drug screening, or the investigator's clinical judgment
  • History of cancer malignancy within 2 years prior to the first visit, with the exception of basal cell skin carcinoma
  • Have filed or plan to file a worker's compensation claim for any issue related to the current acute low back pain episode
  • Currently involved in litigation or plan to seek legal recourse for any issue related to their acute low back pain
  • Known allergies, hypersensitivity, or intolerance to tapentadol or the comparator (oxycodone) or any excipients used in their manufacture
  • Had previously been enrolled in a tapentadol clinical study
  • is pregnant or are breast-feeding
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00986180). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search