Phase 3
N=645
NUCYNTA (Tapentadol Immediate Release) Versus Oxycodone Immediate Release in the Treatment of Acute Low Back Pain
Pain · Back Pain · Low Back Pain · Back Pain With Radiation
Bottom Line
View on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00986180 ↗Enrolled (actual)
645
Serious AEs
0.8%
Results posted
Feb 2012
Primary outcome: Primary: Sum of Pain Intensity Difference (SPID) for Low Back Pain - Summary Statistics at 120 Hours (With Imputation) — 264.6; 264.0 Units on a scale — p=0.9703
Study Design & Population
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Interventions
- NUCYNTA (Drug); Oxycodone IR (Drug)
- Age
- Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
- Sex
- All
- Sponsor
- Ortho-McNeil Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC
- Primary completion
- Dec 2010
Outcome Measures
| Outcome | Result | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY Sum of Pain Intensity Difference (SPID) for Low Back Pain - Summary Statistics at 120 Hours (With Imputation) |
264.6; 264.0 | 0.9703 |
| SECONDARY Sum of Pain Intensity Difference (SPID) for Low Back Pain - Summary Statistics at 2 Days (With Imputation) |
80.1; 81.8 | 0.7691 |
| SECONDARY SPID for Low Back Pain - Summary Statistics at 3 Days (With Imputation) |
137.2; 138.1 | 0.9282 |
| SECONDARY SPID for Low Back Pain - Summary Statistics at 10 Days (With Imputation) |
540.2; 538.6 | 0.9562 |
| SECONDARY SPID for Index Leg Pain - Summary Statistics at 2 Days (With Imputation) |
73.6; 72.1 | 0.7973 |
| SECONDARY SPID for Index Leg Pain - Summary Statistics at 3 Days (With Imputation) |
125.5; 123.0 | 0.7882 |
| SECONDARY SPID for Index Leg Pain - Summary Statistics at 5 Days (With Imputation) |
239.2; 234.1 | 0.7491 |
| SECONDARY SPID for Index Leg Pain - Summary Statistics at 10 Days (With Imputation) |
488.0; 476.4 | 0.6897 |
| SECONDARY Total Pain Relief (TOTPAR) for Low Back Pain - Summary Statistics at 5 Days |
254.8; 256.4 | 0.8226 |
| SECONDARY SF-MPQ-2 - Change From Baseline Values: Subscale and Total Scores - Continuous Pain Day 5 |
-2.4; -2.4 | 0.8880 |
| SECONDARY SF-MPQ-2 - Change From Baseline Values: Subscale and Total Scores - Continuous Pain Day 10/Last Visit |
-3.1; -2.9 | 0.4115 |
| SECONDARY SF-MPQ-2 - Change From Baseline Values: Subscale and Total Scores - Intermittent Pain Day 5 |
-2.6; -2.5 | 0.8495 |
| SECONDARY SF-MPQ-2 - Change From Baseline Values: Subscale and Total Scores - Intermittent Pain Day 10/Last Visit |
-3.3; -3.2 | 0.7846 |
| SECONDARY SF-MPQ-2 - Change From Baseline Values: Subscale and Total Scores - Neuropathic Pain Day 5 |
-1.5; -1.4 | 0.4790 |
| SECONDARY SF-MPQ-2 - Change From Baseline Values: Subscale and Total Scores - Neuropathic Pain Day 10/Last Visit |
-1.8; -1.6 | 0.3147 |
| SECONDARY SF-MPQ-2 - Change From Baseline Values: Subscale and Total Scores - Affective Descriptors Day 5 |
-2.0; -1.9 | 0.5411 |
| SECONDARY SF-MPQ-2 - Change From Baseline Values: Subscale and Total Scores - Affective Descriptors Day 10/Last Visit |
-2.4; -2.2 | 0.6137 |
| SECONDARY SF-MPQ-2 - Change From Baseline Values: Subscale and Total Scores - Total Score Day 5 |
-2.2; -2.1 | 0.7246 |
| SECONDARY SF-MPQ-2 - Change From Baseline Values: Subscale and Total Scores - Total Score Day 10/Last Visit |
-2.7; -2.5 | 0.4882 |
| SECONDARY Patient Global Impression of Change at End of Study |
2.1; 2.1 | — |
| SECONDARY Patient Global Impression of Change at End of Study |
2.1; 2.1 | — |
| SECONDARY Clinician Global Impression of Change at End of Study |
2.1; 2.1 | — |
| SECONDARY Satisfaction With Treatment at Day 5 |
2.0; 2.0 | — |
| SECONDARY Satisfaction With Treatment at End of Study |
2.0; 2.0 | — |
| SECONDARY Incidence of 30% Responders Without Nausea or Vomiting at Day 5 |
117; 104 | 0.1454 |
| SECONDARY Incidence of 50% Responders Without Nausea or Vomiting at Day 5 |
72; 60 | 0.1541 |
| SECONDARY Summary of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Study Drug Discontinuation |
21; 26; 1; 0; 1; 0 | — |
| SECONDARY Summary of Subjects Having Nausea as a Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event |
51; 67 | — |
| SECONDARY Summary of Subjects Having Vomiting as a Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event |
51; 80 | — |
| SECONDARY Summary of Subjects Having Constipation as a Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event |
7; 23 | — |
| SECONDARY Summary of Subjects Having Pruritus as a Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event |
27; 26 | — |
| SECONDARY Kaplan-Meier First Time to 30% Response From Baseline for Low Back Pain |
42.93; 44.27 | 0.5828 |
| SECONDARY Kaplan-Meier First Time to 50% Response From Baseline for Low Back Pain |
92.05; 107.45 | 0.9084 |
Summary
Evaluate how NUCYNTA (tapentadol) immediate release (IR) compares with oxycodone IR in the treatment of acute low back pain.
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- At Visit 1 (study entry) patients must have a medical history and physical and neurological examinations that support a clinical diagnosis of acute low back pain that is felt down to the lower leg below the knee with the onset no longer than 30 days before Visit 1
- At Visit 1 patients must report qualifying pain intensity scores
- Patients must be appropriate candidates for treatment with oral opioid pain medication in the investigator's clinical judgment
- Patients must be able to appropriately verbalize pain characteristics and to complete all protocol required measurements/assessments without assistance
- Patients must be medically stable on the basis of physical examination, medical history, vital signs, and clinical laboratory tests performed at screening
Exclusion Criteria
- History of back (cervical, thoracic or lumbosacral) pain =50% of the time in the 1 year prior to the first visit
- History of any low back pain episode, with the exception of the current acute low back pain episode, within 3 months prior to the first visit that was greater than mild in pain intensity, or was associated with disability (e.g., loss of time from work, family, or activities of daily living), or necessitated the use of an opioid (narcotic) analgesic including tramadol
- Medical history or physical examination results that suggest the acute low back pain or any of the neurological symptoms or signs are caused by a serious medical condition (e.g., fever, chills, unexplained weight loss, bowel or urinary bladder dysfunction or incontinence, bilateral leg weakness, progressive weakness, paralysis)
- There is a high probability for surgical intervention for the back pain during the projected time on the study or that there will be an increase in the severity of the leg pain or deficits
- Had either a surgical procedure involving the spine or intervertebral discs in the lower back region within 1 year prior to Visit 1 or had >1 surgical procedure(s) involving the spine or intervertebral discs in the lower back region
- has any painful condition that could interfere with the study assessments or with the patient's ability to differentiate the pain associated with the acute low back pain episode from pain associated with another condition
- History of severe lumbar spinal stenosis, fibromyalgia, or ankylosing spondylitis
- history of epilepsy or recurrent seizures
- Unable or unwilling to discontinue all prohibited medications at the time of randomization and during the time of their participation in the study
- Known or suspected history of alcohol or drug abuse based on medical history, physical examination, urine drug screening, or the investigator's clinical judgment
- History of cancer malignancy within 2 years prior to the first visit, with the exception of basal cell skin carcinoma
- Have filed or plan to file a worker's compensation claim for any issue related to the current acute low back pain episode
- Currently involved in litigation or plan to seek legal recourse for any issue related to their acute low back pain
- Known allergies, hypersensitivity, or intolerance to tapentadol or the comparator (oxycodone) or any excipients used in their manufacture
- Had previously been enrolled in a tapentadol clinical study
- is pregnant or are breast-feeding
Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00986180). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.