Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 4 N=126 Randomized Treatment

Propofol Versus Alfentanil Versus Nitrous Oxide for Moderate Procedural Sedation

Sedation

Enrolled (actual)
126
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Jan 2017
Primary outcome: Primary: Number of Participants With Sub-clinical Respiratory Depression and Clinical Events Associated With Respiratory Depression During the Sedation Procedure — 11; 12 participants

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Interventions
Propofol (Drug); Alfentanil (Drug)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute
Primary completion
Apr 2015

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Number of Participants With Sub-clinical Respiratory Depression and Clinical Events Associated With Respiratory Depression During the Sedation Procedure
11; 12
SECONDARY
Time to Return of Baseline Mental Status From Start of Procedure in Minutes
13; 13
SECONDARY
Depth of Sedation Measured Using the OAAS Scale
2; 3
SECONDARY
Patient Reported Pain
7; 25
SECONDARY
Patient Reported Recall of the Procedure
13; 39 0.657

Summary

This is a clinical trial of propofol and alfentanil as agents for moderated procedural sedation in patients undergoing sedation in the emergency department (ED).

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Adults undergoing moderate procedural sedation in the Emergency Department

Exclusion Criteria

  • Age 2
  • Patients who require deep procedural sedation
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00997126). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search