Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 4 Completed N=100 Randomized Treatment

Propofol Versus Ketamine for Moderate Procedural Sedation in the Emergency Department (ED)

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00997321 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
100
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Mar 2012
Primary outcomePrimary: Respiratory Depression (Sub-clinical and Clinical Signs) — 0.4; 0.6 percentage of participants

Summary

This study is a clinical trial of moderate sedation with propofol versus moderate sedation with ketamine for procedural sedation in the Emergency Department.

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Respiratory Depression (Sub-clinical and Clinical Signs)
0.4; 0.6
SECONDARY
Time to Return of Baseline Mental Status
5; 14
SECONDARY
Patient Reported Pain or Recall of the Procedure
0.06; 0.02
SECONDARY
Depth of Sedation
2; 2

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • patients who require moderate procedural sedation with propofol in the ED

Exclusion Criteria

  • age > 17 years
  • pregnant
  • intoxicated
  • cannot give informed consent
  • allergy to ketamine or propofol
  • patient will require deep procedural sedation
  • ASA physical status score > 2
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00997321). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search