Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=203

Optimization and Refinement of Technique in In-Office Sinus Dilation 2

Sinusitis

Enrolled (actual)
203
Serious AEs
0.5%
Results posted
Sep 2014
Primary outcome: Primary: Mean Intra-patient Change in SNOT-20 Score — -1.16 Scores on a scale

Study Design & Population

Study type
Observational
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Relieva Balloon Sinuplasty System (Device)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Integra LifeSciences Corporation
Primary completion
Jan 2012

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Mean Intra-patient Change in SNOT-20 Score
-1.16
PRIMARY
Mean Intra-patient Change in Lund-Mackay CT Scan Score
-4.32
SECONDARY
Procedure Tolerability
163
SECONDARY
Proportion of Sinuses Successfully Treated in the Office Using Balloon Catheter Tools and Traditional Endoscopic Tools as Necessary
552
SECONDARY
Proportion of Sinuses Successfully Treated in the Absence of Serious, Procedural Adverse Events.
552
SECONDARY
Mean Number of Days to Return to Normal Activities
2.3

Summary

A prospective, multi-arm, multi-center, observational post-market study of balloon sinus dilatation in the physician office setting under local anesthesia to treat patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). All products intended for use in this study have been FDA cleared for sale in the U.S.A.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Male/Female, 18 year or older
  • Diagnosis of Chronic Rhinosinusitis
  • Planned Endoscopic Sinus surgery

Exclusion Criteria

  • Cystic Fibrosis
  • Severe Polyposis
  • Sinonasal tumors
  • History of facial trauma precluding access to sinus ostium
  • Ciliary Disfunction
  • Planned non-sinus surgery (such as rhinoplasty, septoplasty, etc.)
  • Pregnant or lactating female
  • Inability to tolerate an awake procedure
  • Participation in another investigational clinical study involving treatment for chronic rhinosinusitis
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01107379). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search