Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=14 Randomized Single-blind Treatment

Absorbable Suture Versus Tissue Glue to Repair Defects Following Mohs Surgery

Basal Cell Carcinoma · Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Enrolled (actual)
14
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Nov 2012
Primary outcome: Primary: Visual Analog Scale (VAS) — 7.47; 7.97 units on a scale

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Cyanoacrylate tissue glue versus Fast absorbing gut (Device)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Yale University
Primary completion
Aug 2011

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
7.47; 7.97

Summary

The purpose of the study is to look at which nonpermanent superficial closure method, cyanoacrylate tissue glue or fast absorbing gut suture, leads to a better cosmetic and functional outcome in repairs of facial wounds after Mohs surgery.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • The subject is willing and able to give informed consent.
  • The subject is willing and able to participate in the study as an outpatient and is willing to comply with study requirements.
  • The subject is 18 years of age or older.
  • The subject has a diagnosis of a non-melanoma skin cancer on the face requiring Mohs micrographic surgery.
  • The subjects also has a final wound length of 3cm or greater.
  • The subject is able to abide by the protocol of standard postoperative care and is able to attend standard post-operative visits at 3 months after the surgery.

Exclusion Criteria

  • The subject is on systemic immunosuppressants and/or is an organ transplant recipients.
  • The subject has reported or suspected hypersensitivity to cyanoacrylate or fast absorbing gut suture.
  • The subject has a dermatologic disease in the target site that may interfere with examination.
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01298167). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search