Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A Completed N=144 Randomized Single-blind

Product Feasibility of a New Silicone Hydrogel Contact Lens

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01309100 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
144
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Apr 2014
Primary outcomePrimary: Visual Acuity (Investigational vs Air Optix Aqua Lens) — -0.050; -0.060; -0.034; -0.039 LogMAR

Summary

The objective of this study is to determine the clinical feasibility and to evaluate the product performance of investigational contact lens.

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Visual Acuity (Investigational vs Air Optix Aqua Lens)
-0.050; -0.060; -0.034; -0.039
PRIMARY
Visual Acuity (Investigational vs Acuvue Oasys Lens)
-0.050; -0.048; -0.034; -0.033
SECONDARY
Comfort Throughout the Day (Investigational vs Acuvue Oasys Lens)
80.9; 86.5
SECONDARY
Comfort Throughout the Day (Investigational vs Air Optix Aqua Lens)
80.9; 82.1

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Subjects must have clear central corneas and be free of any anterior segment disorders.
  • Subjects must be adapted wearers of soft contact lenses, wear a lens in each eye, and each lens must be of the same manufacture and brand.
  • Subjects must be myopic and require lens correction

Exclusion Criteria

  • Subjects with any systemic disease affecting ocular health.
  • Subjects using any systemic or topical medications that will, in the Investigator's opinion, affect ocular physiology or lens performance.
  • Subjects with an active ocular disease or are using any ocular medication.
  • Subjects with any "Present" finding during the slit lamp examination that, in the Investigator's judgment, interferes with contact lens wear.
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01309100). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search