Effectiveness of Electronic Health Record-Based Interventions for Improving Follow-Up in Primary Care
Colon Cancer · Lung Cancer · Prostate Cancer
Bottom Line
View on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01346839 ↗Study Design & Population
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- N/A
- Interventions
- Contact Intervention (Behavioral)
- Age
- Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
- Sex
- All
- Sponsor
- Baylor College of Medicine
- Primary completion
- Aug 2012
Outcome Measures
| Outcome | Result | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY Differences in Time to Documented Follow-up of a Red Flag Suggestive of Cancer |
104; 200; 144; 192; 65; 93 | <0.05 sig |
| SECONDARY Percentage of Patients Receiving Timely Follow-up of a Red Flag Suggestive of Cancer |
73.4; 52.2 | — |
| SECONDARY Percentage of Cases With no Documented Justification for no Follow-up |
33.9; 48.0 | — |
| SECONDARY Number of Participants Diagnosed With Cancer After Delay in Diagnostic Evaluation |
13; 10 | — |
| SECONDARY Trigger Positive Predictive Value |
63.5; 55.3 | — |
Summary
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
All primary care providers at both study sites who agree to be in the study. Intervention will be performed on those whose patients are electronically identified to have suspected cancer defined as presence of any predefined clue for cancer that is not followed-up in a timely manner. Three cancers are included; colorectal, lung and prostate and their clues include • chest x-imaging suspicious for malignancy • suspected or confirmed iron deficiency anemia • positive FOBT • hematochezia • abnormal PSA Patients will be selected from the data warehouse .
Exclusion Criteria
Primary care providers who do not wish to be in the study.
Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01346839). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.