N/A
N=236
Clinical Comparison of Two Daily Disposable Toric Lenses
Myopia · Astigmatism
Bottom Line
View on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01362894 ↗Enrolled (actual)
236
Serious AEs
0.4%
Results posted
Aug 2012
Primary outcome: Primary: Overall Vision — 8.2; 7.5 Units on a scale
Study Design & Population
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- N/A
- Interventions
- nelfilcon A contact lens (Device); etafilcon A contact lens (Device)
- Age
- Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
- Sex
- All
- Sponsor
- CIBA VISION
- Primary completion
- Aug 2011
Outcome Measures
| Outcome | Result | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY Overall Vision |
8.2; 7.5 | — |
| PRIMARY Overall Comfort |
7.8; 7.2 | — |
| PRIMARY Overall Handling |
8.2; 6.8 | — |
| PRIMARY Overall Satisfaction |
7.7; 6.9 | — |
| SECONDARY Ease of Selecting Final Lens Power |
8.4; 8.8 | — |
Summary
The purpose of this trial was to compare the performance of two contact lenses commercially available for people with astigmatism.
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- Sign written informed consent.
- Germany: Be of legal age.
- Current monthly or weekly toric soft lens wearer able to be fit in both eyes with soft toric lenses in the study parameters.
- Other protocol-defined inclusion criteria may apply.
Exclusion Criteria
- Eye injury or surgery within twelve weeks.
- Pre-existing ocular irritation that would preclude contact lens fitting.
- Currently enrolled in an ophthalmic clinical trial.
- Wears contact lenses overnight while sleeping.
- Habitual daily disposable contact lens wearer.
- Monovision correction during the study.
- Other protocol-defined exclusion criteria may apply.
Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01362894). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.