Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=885 Randomized Treatment

Comparison Between FFR Guided Revascularization Versus Conventional Strategy in Acute STEMI Patients With MVD.

Myocardial Infarction · Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease

Enrolled (actual)
885
Serious AEs
45.2%
Results posted
Jul 2020
Primary outcome: Primary: Number of Participants With the Composite Endpoint of MACCE — 23; 121 Participants — p=<0.001

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
FFR-guided revascularisation strategy (Procedure); randomised to guidelines group (Procedure)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Maasstad Hospital
Primary completion
Oct 2016

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Number of Participants With the Composite Endpoint of MACCE
23; 121 <0.001 sig
PRIMARY
Number of Participants With Death From Any Cause
4; 10 0.70
PRIMARY
Number of Participants With Cardiac Death
3; 6 1.00
PRIMARY
Number of Participants With Spontaneous MI
5; 17 0.10
PRIMARY
Number of Participants With Periprocedural MI
2; 11 0.29
PRIMARY
Number of Participants With Revascularization - PCI
15; 98 <0.001 sig
PRIMARY
Number of Participants With Revascularization - CABG
3; 5 0.80
PRIMARY
Number of Participants With Cerebrovascular Event
1; 7
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Composite Endpoint of NACE (Any First Event)
25; 174
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Death From Any Cause or MI
28; 73
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Major Bleeding
3; 8
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Any Bleeding at 12 Months
9; 28
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Any Bleeding at 48 Hours
5; 8
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Hospitalization
28; 75
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Revascularization
19; 161
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Stent Thrombosis
2; 1
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Primary Endpoint Outcome MACCE (Any First Event) at 3 Year
46; 178
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With All Cause Death at 3 Year
9; 21
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Cardiac Death at 3 Year
5; 8
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Spontaneous MI at 3 Year
17; 40
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Peri-procedural MI at 3 Year
3; 13
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Urgent Revascularization at 3 Year
22; 85
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Elective Revascularization at 3 Year
15; 64
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Cerebrovascular Event
1; 7
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Composite Endpoint of NACE (Any First Event) at 3 Year
45; 215
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Death From Any Cause or MI
28; 73
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Major Bleeding at 3 Year
3; 8
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Hospitalization
28; 75
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Hospitalization at 3 Year
30; 87
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Stent Thrombosis at 3 Year
4; 12
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Any Bleeding at 3 Year
4; 12

Summary

The Compare-Acute trial is a prospective randomised trial in patients with multivessel disease, who are admitted into hospital with a ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction. The purpose of the study is to compare a FFR guided multivessel PCI taking place during the primary PCI with a primary PCI of the culprit vessel only. Patients will be enrolled after successful revascularisation of the culprit vessel. Patients that have at least one lesion with a diameter of stenosis of more than 50% on visual estimation, feasible (operators judgement) for treatment with PCI in a non-infarct related artery, will be randomised either to the FFR guided complete revascularisation arm or staged revascularisation by proven ischemia or persistence of symptoms of angina. Approximately 885 patients will be entered in the study. Study hypothesis: FFR-guided complete percutaneous revascularisation of all flow-limiting stenoses in the non-IRA performed within the same procedure as the primary PCI or within the same hospitalisation will improve clinical outcomes compared to the staged revascularisation, guided by prove of ischemia or clinical judgment, as recommended from the guidelines.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • All patients between 18-85 years presenting with STEMI who will be treated with primary PCI in 50% in a non-IRA on QCA or visual estimation of baseline angiography and judged feasible for treatment with PCI by the operator.
  • Patients with symptoms for more than 12 hr but ongoing angina complaints can be randomised

Exclusion Criteria

  • Left main stem disease (stenosis > 50%)
  • STEMI due to in-stent thrombosis
  • Chronic total occlusion of a non-IRA
  • Severe stenosis with TIMI flow ≤ II of the non-IRA artery.
  • Non-IRA stenosis not amenable for PCI treatment (operators decision)
  • Complicated IRA treatment, with one or more of the following;
  • Extravasation,
  • Permanent no re-flow after IRA treatment (TIMI flow 0-1),
  • Inability to implant a stent
  • Known severe cardiac valve dysfunction that will require surgery in the follow-up period.
  • Killip class III or IV already at presentation or at the completion of culprit lesion treatment.
  • Life expectancy of < 2 years.
  • Intolerance to Aspirin, Clopidogrel, Prasugrel, Ticagrelor, Heparin, Bivaluridin, or Everolimus and known true anaphylaxis to prior contrast media of bleeding diathesis or known coagulopathy.
  • Gastrointestinal or genitourinary bleeding within the prior 3 months,
  • Planned elective surgical procedure necessitating interruption of thienopyridines during the first 6 months post enrolment.
  • Patients who are actively participating in another drug or device investigational study, which have not completed the primary endpoint follow-up period.
  • Pregnancy or planning to become pregnant any time after enrolment into this study.
  • Inability to obtain informed consent.
  • Expected lost to follow-up.
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01399736). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search