Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 3 N=276 Single-blind Diagnostic

Effectiveness of an Electronic Training Program for Orienting and Interpreting [18F]Flutemetamol Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Images

Alzheimer's Disease · Mild Cognitive Impairment

Enrolled (actual)
276
Serious AEs
Results posted
Dec 2013
Primary outcome: Primary: Summary of Sensitivity of the Blinded Visual PET Image Interpretations Without Anatomic Images. — 94; 92; 90; 94 Percentage (True Positive)

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Interventions
[18F]Flutemetamol (Drug)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
GE Healthcare
Primary completion
Aug 2012

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Summary of Sensitivity of the Blinded Visual PET Image Interpretations Without Anatomic Images.
94; 92; 90; 94; 84; 94
PRIMARY
Summary of Specificity of Blinded Visual PET Image Interpretations Without Anatomic Images.
79; 81; 93; 77; 96; 92
SECONDARY
Inter-Reader Agreement of PET Images Without Anatomic Images
248; 257; 242; 251; 255; 250

Summary

To Evaluate the Effectiveness of an Electronic Training Program for Orienting and Interpreting [18F]flutemetamol Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Images.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Subject received a dose of Flutemetamol F 18 Injection ranging from approximately 185 MBq to approximately 370 MBq.
  • The subject was classified as one of the following:
  • End-of-life subject who expired and underwent brain autopsy, with histochemical (HC) confirmation of brain amyloid status.
  • Subject with known/suspected normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) who underwent brain biopsy, with HC confirmation of brain amyloid status.
  • Elderly healthy volunteer (age ≥55).
  • Young healthy volunteer (age ≤40).
  • Subject with probable Alzheimer Disease (pAD).
  • Subject with amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment (aMCI).

Exclusion Criteria

  • Not Applicable
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01672827). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search