Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
Phase 4 Completed N=218 Randomized Treatment

Spinal Cord Stimulation for Predominant Low Back Pain

Failed Back Surgery Syndrome · Back Pain · Pain in Leg, Unspecified
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01697358 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
218
Serious AEs
11.5%
Results posted
Jun 2017
Primary outcomePrimary: Compare Proportion of Subjects With ≥50% Reduction in Low Back Pain Intensity Between the Treatment Groups — 15; 5 Participants — p=0.036
◆ Published Evidence
Highly cited
148citations · ~21 / year
Multicolumn spinal cord stimulation for predominant back pain in failed back surgery syndrome patients: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.
Pain · 2019 · Open access · Likely link

Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) using the Medtronic Specify® 5-6-5 multicolumn surgical lead plus optimal medical management (OMM) versus OMM alone in patients suffering from predominant low back pain due to failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS).

Linked Publications (3)

  • Multicolumn spinal cord stimulation for predominant back pain in failed back surgery syndrome patients: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.
    Pain · 2019 · 148 citations · Open access · Likely link
  • Implanted spinal neuromodulation interventions for chronic pain in adults.
    The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021 · 86 citations · Open access · Likely link
  • Spinal cord stimulation for predominant low back pain in failed back surgery syndrome: study protocol for an international multicenter randomized controlled trial (PROMISE study).
    Trials · 2013 · 42 citations · Open access · Likely link

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Compare Proportion of Subjects With ≥50% Reduction in Low Back Pain Intensity Between the Treatment Groups
15; 5 0.036 sig
SECONDARY
Compare Change in Low Back Pain Intensity, as Measured by the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), Between the Treatment Groups
1.4; 0.3 < 0.001 sig
SECONDARY
Compare Change in Leg Pain Intensity, as Measured by the NPRS, Between the Treatment Groups
1.2; -0.1 < 0.001 sig
SECONDARY
Compare Change in Functional Disability, as Measured by the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Between the Treatment Groups
8.1; 1.8 < 0.001 sig
SECONDARY
Compare Change in Quality of Life (QoL), as Measured by the SF-36 Physical Component Summary (PCS), Between the Treatment Groups
5.27; 1.34 < 0.001 sig

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • SCS candidate with the Specify 5-6-5 surgical lead
  • Has FBSS and does not require further surgery (defined as persistent or recurrent low back and leg pain of at least 6 months duration following at least one decompression and/or fusion procedure)
  • Average low back pain is ≥ 5 as assessed by the baseline NPRS
  • Average low back pain is greater than leg pain
  • Subject has persistent moderate to severe low back and leg pain despite other treatments

Exclusion Criteria

  • Treated with SCS, subcutaneous or peripheral nerve stimulation, an intrathecal drug delivery system, requires back surgery at the location related to his/her original back pain complaint or experimental therapies
  • Most recent back surgery < 6 months ago
  • Low back pain only (no leg pain)
  • Investigator suspects substance abuse that might confound the study results
  • Radiographic evidence of instability requiring fusion
  • Pain relieved completely by lying down
  • Life expectancy of < 24 months
  • Subject is pregnant or planning to become pregnant during the course of the study
  • Subject is unable to undergo study assessments or complete questionnaires independently
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01697358) and the linked publication. Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search