Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=710 Treatment

Uphold LITE Post-Market Surveillance Study

Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Enrolled (actual)
710
Serious AEs
5.5%
Results posted
Mar 2021
Primary outcome: Primary: Primary Efficacy Endpoint - Number of Participants With Composite Anatomic and Symptomatic Success at 36 Months — 201; 389; 199; 384 Participants — p=0.056

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Uphold Lightweight Vaginal Support System (Device); Traditional native tissue repair (Procedure)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
Female
Sponsor
Boston Scientific Corporation
Primary completion
Feb 2020

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Primary Efficacy Endpoint - Number of Participants With Composite Anatomic and Symptomatic Success at 36 Months
201; 389; 199; 384 0.056
PRIMARY
Co-Primary Safety Endpoint - Number of Participants With One or More Serious Device-Related and/or Procedure-Related Complications at 36 Months
7; 13; 7; 12
SECONDARY
Secondary Endpoint - Number of Participants With Mesh Erosion and Exposures Over Time in Intent-to-Treat Subjects
0; 0; 0; 0; 0; 0
SECONDARY
Secondary Endpoint - Number of Participants With One or More Device-Related and/or Procedure-Related Adverse Events
2; 6; 2; 6; 11; 28
SECONDARY
Secondary Endpoint - PFDI-20 Change From Baseline in Intent-to-Treat Subjects
-78.9; -77.7; -74.8; -76.9; -78.5; -77.3
SECONDARY
Secondary Endpoint - PFIQ-7 Change From Baseline in Intent-to-Treat Subjects
-51.2; -41.0; -47.7; -41.9; -48.8; -42.9
SECONDARY
Secondary Endpoint - PISQ-12 Change From Baseline in Intent-to-Treat Subjects
4.4; 4.4; 3.9; 4.4; 4.1; 4.0
SECONDARY
Secondary Endpoint - TOMUS Pain Score Change From Baseline in Intent-to-Treat Subjects
-3.8; -3.3; -3.4; -3.8; -3.5; -4.2
SECONDARY
Secondary Endpoint: PGI-I for Prolapse Symptoms in Intent-to-Treat Subjects
1.4; 1.3; 1.5; 1.4; 1.4; 1.4
SECONDARY
Secondary Endpoint - Number of Participants With Intervention for Recurrent Prolapse and Complications at 36 Months Post Index Procedure
1; 2; 1; 2; 5; 15
SECONDARY
Secondary Efficacy Endpoint - Number of Participants With Composite Anatomic and Symptomatic Success at 36 Months
188; 353; 185; 346

Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare transvaginal mesh repair to traditional native tissue repair in women surgically treated for anterior and/or apical pelvic organ prolapse.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Subject is female
  • Subject is ≥18 years of age
  • Subject has pelvic organ prolapse with the leading edge at or beyond the hymen. At or beyond the hymen is defined as POP-Q scores of Ba≥0 or (for prolapse of the anterior compartment alone) C≥0 (for prolapse of the apical compartment alone) or C≥-1/2 TVL and Ba≥0 (for a multi-compartment prolapse that includes the anterior and apical compartments).
  • Subject reports of a bothersome bulge they can see or feel per PFDI-20, question 3 response of 2 or higher (i.e. responses of "somewhat", "moderately" or "quite a bit")
  • Subject or subject's legally authorized representative must be willing to provide written informed consent
  • Subject is willing and able to comply with the follow-up regimen

Exclusion Criteria

  • Subject has an active or chronic systemic infection including any gynecologic infection, untreated urinary tract infection (UTI) or tissue necrosis
  • Subject has history of pelvic organ cancer (e.g. uterine, ovarian, bladder, colo-rectal or cervical)
  • Subject has had prior or is currently undergoing radiation, laser therapy, or chemotherapy in the pelvic area
  • Subject has taken systemic steroids (within the last month) or immunosuppressive or immunomodulatory treatment (within the last 3 months)
  • Subject has systemic connective tissue disease (e.g. scleroderma, systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), Marfans syndrome, Ehlers Danlos, collagenosis, polymyositis polymyalgia rheumatica)
  • Subject has a known neurologic or medical condition affecting bladder function (e.g. multiple sclerosis, spinal cord injury, or stroke with residual neurologic deficit)
  • Subject is seeking obliterative vaginal surgery as treatment for pelvic organ prolapse (colpocleisis)
  • Subject has a previous prolapse repair with mesh in the target compartment
  • Subject is planning to undergo a concomitant repair with use of mesh in the non-target compartment
  • Subject is not able to conform to the modified dorsal lithotomy position
  • Subject has chronic systemic pain that includes the pelvic area or chronic focal pain that includes the pelvis
  • Subject has uncontrolled diabetes mellitus (DM)
  • Subject is currently participating in or plans to participate in another device or drug study during this study
  • Subject has a known hypersensitivity to polypropylene mesh
  • Subject is pregnant or intends to become pregnant during the study
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01917968). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search