N/A
N=278
Retrospective Review of Mechanically Ventilated Patients Using a Continuous Data Collection System.
Mechanical Ventilation · Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome · Hypoxic Respiratory Failure
Bottom Line
View on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02184208 ↗Enrolled (actual)
278
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Feb 2018
Primary outcome: Primary: Successful Extubation — 58; 222 Participants
Study Design & Population
- Study type
- Observational
- Phase
- N/A
- Interventions
- —
- Age
- Pediatric, Adult · 0+ yrs
- Sex
- All
- Sponsor
- Boston Children's Hospital
- Primary completion
- Dec 2016
Outcome Measures
| Outcome | Result | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY Successful Extubation |
58; 222 | — |
Summary
Today, the electronic medical record, microprocessor mechanical ventilators, and physiologic monitoring are under-utilized when translating research into decision support. Current medical informatic capabilities can be leveraged to calculate trends in measured parameters to initiate a paradigm shift in critical care from reaction-based treatment to proactive and plausibly preventative care. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to develop baseline understanding of our practice and how data collection utilizing a newly implemented system called T3. We would like to retrospectively review mechanically ventilated patients in which we have collected continuous data to test a newly developed analytic platform. Additionally we would like to compare these results to our standards of practice established by clinical practice guidelines.
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- Patient selection will be determined by available data collected in the T3 system. We estimate 50 patients in which mechanical ventilator data has been collected utilizing the limited intellibridge modules (4 systems currently available to collect ventilator data).
Exclusion Criteria
- Patient not connected to T3 data collection system.
Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02184208). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.