Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A Completed N=52 Health Services Research

DMH-Based Plan Evaluation and Inverse Optimization in Radiotherapy

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02663817 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
52
Serious AEs
—
Results posted
Feb 2020
Primary outcomePrimary: Percent Change in Radiation Dose to Healthy Human Tissue. — 3.0; 31.0; 25.0; 2.0 Percent change in radiation dose

Summary

The hypotheses of the study are as follows: * Mass-based inverse optimization in radiotherapy treatment planning will result in a reduction of normal tissue and organs at risk (OAR) doses for desired prescription therapeutic doses to the targets. * Dose-mass histograms (DMHs) may be more relevant to radiotherapy treatment planning and treatment plan assessment than the standard of care, realized through dose-volume histograms (DVHs)

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Percent Change in Radiation Dose to Healthy Human Tissue.
3.0; 31.0; 25.0; 2.0; 11.0; 24.0 —

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Patients must have histologically confirmed head-and-neck, lung, or prostate tumors.
  • Patients who will be treated with radiation therapy or concurrent chemoradiation therapy.
  • Gross Tumor Volume (GTV) or resection cavity must be visible on CT such that it can be delineated as a target for radiotherapy.
  • Patients who are able to understand the investigational nature of this study and agree to sign a written informed consent document.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Pregnant or nursing women will not participate. Women of reproductive potential must be offered a pre-treatment pregnancy test and informed of the need to practice an effective contraceptive method during the therapy.
  • Patients younger than 18 years.
  • Patients whose size and weight would not allow CT scanning.
  • No vulnerable populations (fetuses, pregnant women, children, prisoners) will be included in this study.
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02663817). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search