Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=27

Comparison or Rose Bengal and Toluidine Blue Staining for Lesion Detection Efficacy

Oral Leukoplakia · Oral Lichen Planus · Premalignant Lesion

Enrolled (actual)
27
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Nov 2018
Primary outcome: Primary: Number and Percentage of Lesions That Were Stained Positive — 29; 28 lesions — p=0.005

Study Design & Population

Study type
Observational
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Biopsy (Procedure); Rose Bengal (Diagnostic_test); toluidine blue (Diagnostic_test)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
The Oxford Dental College, Hospital and Research Center, Bangalore, India
Primary completion
Mar 2016

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Number and Percentage of Lesions That Were Stained Positive
29; 28 0.005 sig
PRIMARY
Sensitivity and Specificity (Percentage of True Positives and True Negatives)
100; 90
SECONDARY
Presence of Dysplasia in Biopsied Lesions That Were Stained by Rose Bengal
5; 15; 1

Summary

Abstract Objective: To study the diagnostic efficiency of Rose Bengal with Toluidine blue in detecting the biopsy sites and thus establish an accurate diagnosis in oral premalignant lesions. Materials and method: In our study 27 patients with 41 lesions were included. Since one patient had not quit the habit in the two weeks following initial examination and another lesion disappeared in the waiting period, 2 patients (3 lesions) were not included in the study. Out of 38 lesions diagnosed based on clinical criteria, 32 were leukoplakia, 5 lichen planus and 1 SCC. After initial examination they were subjected to Rose Bengal and Toluidine blue stain. If stained positive they were subjected to biopsy.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Patients with clinically diagnosed oral premalignant lesions (oral leukoplakia and oral lichen planus).

Exclusion Criteria

  • Patients with OSMF
  • bleeding disorders and
  • other systemic diseases
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03031899). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search