Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=202 Randomized Single-blind Treatment

RHA Redensity - Perioral Rhytids

Perioral Rhytids · Aging · Wrinkle

Enrolled (actual)
202
Serious AEs
2.0%
Results posted
Jul 2020
Primary outcome: Primary: Change From Baseline in Perioral Rhytids Severity Rating Scale (PR-SRS) Score Rated by the Blinded Live Evaluator (BLE) at Week 8 After Last Treatment. — 121; 4; 29; 47 Participants — p=0.0001

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
TEOSYAL RHA Redensity (Device)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 22+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Teoxane SA
Primary completion
Dec 2017

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Change From Baseline in Perioral Rhytids Severity Rating Scale (PR-SRS) Score Rated by the Blinded Live Evaluator (BLE) at Week 8 After Last Treatment.
121; 4; 29; 47 0.0001 sig
SECONDARY
Subject's Perception of Treatment Effectiveness as Per the FACE-Q Scale (Perioral Rhytid Domain) Questionnaire at Baseline, Weeks 4 and 8 After Last Treatment.
23.3; 24.2; 70.0; 24.0; 46.5; 0.3
SECONDARY
Number of Subjects Who Scored Themselves Either "Much Improved" or "Improved" on Global Aesthetic Improvement (GAI) Scale at Week 8 and 4 After Last Treatment.
144; 1; 2; 46; 4; 4
SECONDARY
Number of Subjects Scored Either "Much Improved" or "Improved" on Global Aesthetic Improvement (GAI) Scale by the Blinded Live Evaluator (BLE) at Week 8 After Last Treatment.
135; 4; 11; 44; 4; 3
SECONDARY
Number of Subjects "Satisfied" or "Very Satisfied" With Study Treatment Using the Subject Satisfaction Scale at Week 8 After Last Treatment.
133; 4; 14; 39; 3; 8
SECONDARY
Number of Participants With Adverse Events for the Safety Evaluation of TEOSYAL RHA® Redensity.
120; 73; 7; 0; 0
SECONDARY
Number of Post-Injection Treatment Responses (From Common Treatment Responses (CTR) Diary) for the Safety Evaluation of TEOSYAL RHA® Redensity.
131; 54; 105; 115; 146; 115
SECONDARY
Assessment of Injection Site Pain Felt by the Patient for the Safety Evaluation of TEOSYAL RHA® Redensity.
19.9; 3.1; 25.4; 4.4; 14.3; 2.0
SECONDARY
Assessments of the Lip Function (Lip Movement) by the Treating Investigator (TI) for the Safety Evaluation of TEOSYAL RHA® Redensity.
100.0; 87.0; 100.0; 91.7; 100.0; 100.0
SECONDARY
Assessments of the Lip Function by the Treating Investigator (TI) for the Safety Evaluation of TEOSYAL RHA® Redensity.
199; 0; 176; 24; 198; 0
SECONDARY
Assessments of the Lip Function by the Treating Investigator (TI) for the Safety Evaluation of TEOSYAL RHA® Redensity.
199; 0; 176; 24; 198; 0

Summary

Randomized, blinded, No-Treatment control, multi-center, prospective clinical study, to identify whether TEOSYAL RHA® Redensity is more effective than No-Treatment in the correction of moderate to severe dynamic perioral rhytids at Week 8 after last treatment (i.e., initial or touch-up treatment). The Treating Investigator (TI) at screening will evaluate the subject's perioral rhytids severity using the Perioral Rhytids Severity Rating Scale (PR-SRS) for eligibility of the subject for the study. The Blinded Live Evaluator (BLE) at screening will evaluate the subject's perioral rhytids severity using the PR-SRS in order to confirm eligibility and to establish a pre-treatment (Baseline) score for assessment of effectiveness. This is done independently of the TI, and exact concordance between the BLE and the TI is not necessary for eligibility of the subject in this study. Enrolled subjects will be randomized to either the TEOSYAL RHA® Redensity treatment group or the "No-Treatment" control group (ratio 3:1). The TI will administrate the study device, and if necessary, subjects will receive a touch-up treatment 14 days following the initial treatment to optimize the results. The TI will conduct safety and effectiveness evaluations at study visits, which occurred at Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, and 52 after the last treatment, (i.e., initial or touch-up treatment) and 4 weeks after a Repeat-Treatment. The Blinded Live Evaluator (BLE) will conduct assessments of effectiveness during the trial, including assessment of the primary endpoint at Week 8 after the last treatment (i.e., initial or touch-up treatment). The BLE will conduct effectiveness evaluations at Week 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, and 52 after the last treatment (i.e., initial or touch-up treatment). All subjects will be followed for 52 weeks after the last treatment (i.e., initial treatment or touch-up), at which point they will be offered Repeat-Treatment (provided that the TI deems the treatment to be appropriate and the subject agrees) and will be then followed for 4 weeks after Repeat-Treatment before exiting the study. If a subject returns to his pre-treatment PR-SRS score at Week 12 or Week 16 or Week 24 or Week 36 after initial treatment or touch up (as assessed by the TI), subjects are eligible for optional Early-Retreatment if necessary at 12 or 16 or 24 or 36 weeks after last treatment (provided that the TI deems the treatment appropriate, and the subject agrees). Subjects will be then followed for an additional 4 weeks after Repeat-Treatment. Subjects who will receive optional Early-Retreatment at Week 12 or Week 16 or Week 24 or Week 36 after the after initial treatment or touch-up, will be offered Repeat-Treatment at Week 52. Subjects randomized to the "No-Treatment" control group will receive their first treatment after the primary endpoint evaluation (Week 8 after randomization) and then will be followed the same schedule as the initial treatment group.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Outpatient, male or female of any race, 22 years of age or older
  • Moderate to severe perioral rhytids of grade 2 or 3 on the four-point PR-SRS (ranging from 0-3)
  • Willing to abstain from facial aesthetic procedures/therapies that could interfere with study evaluations
  • Able to follow study instructions and complete all required visits.
  • Sign the IRB-approved ICF, Photographic Release Form and the Authorization for Use and release of Health and Research Study Information (HIPAA) form prior to any study- related procedures being performed.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Female subjects that are pregnant, breast-feeding or of childbearing potential and not practicing reliable birth control
  • Known hypersensitivity/allergy to any component of the study devices
  • Known susceptibility to keloid formation, hypertrophic scarring or clinically significant skin pigmentation disorders
  • Clinically significant active skin disease within 6 months
  • History of connective tissue disease
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03092219). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search