N/A N=20 Perioral Rejuvenation and Upper Lip Enhancement
Perioral Rejuvenation · Upper Lip Projection
Primary: Nasal Tip Projection — 0.601 ratio
Clinical Trial Search
Completed trials with posted results — search by concept, filter by the parameters that matter at the bedside.
N/A N=202 RHA Redensity - Perioral Rhytids
Perioral Rhytids · Aging · Wrinkle
Primary: Change From Baseline in Perioral Rhytids Severity Rating Scale (PR-SRS) Score Rated by the Blinded Live Evaluator (BLE) at Week 8 After Last Treatment. — 121; 4; 29; 47…
Phase 4 N=20 Study of Restylane and Perlane in the Correction of Peri-Oral Wrinkles
Peri-oral Wrinkles
Primary: Local and Systemic Adverse Events — 100 percentage of participants
N/A N=20 Assess the Impact of Lip Rejuvenation on Projected First Impressions and Mood Perceptions
Lip Rejuvenation
Primary: First Impressions — 46.756; 27.769; 46.391; 34.404 score on a scale
N/A N=30 RHA® Redensity With New Anesthetic Agent - Perioral Rhytids
Aging · Pain
Primary: Non-inferiority of RHA® Redensity With New Anesthetic Agent Versus RHA® Redensity With Lidocaine in Terms of Reducing Pain During Device Injection Into the Upper…
N/A N=169 Restylane Perlane Lidocaine for Correction of Midface Volume Deficit and/or Midface Contour Deficiency
Midface Volume Deficit
Primary: Percent Responders With 1 Point Improvement on the Medicis Midface Volume Scale — 67; 8 Participants
N/A N=148 Restylane Defyne for Correction of Chin Retrusion
Chin Retrusion
Primary: Percentage of Participants (Responders) With At Least 1-Point Improvement From Baseline on the GCRS, as Assessed by the Blinded Evaluator at Month 6 ([Baseline…
N/A N=138 JUVEDERM® Ultra XC vs. Belotero Balance® for Perioral Lines
Patients With Moderate to Severe Perioral Lines
Primary: Percentage of Participants With at Least a 1 Point Improvement From Baseline on the Perioral Lines Severity Scale (POLSS) — 87; 72 percentage of participants
N/A N=118 TEOSYAL® RHA Ultra Deep and Perlane-L® for the Correction of Nasolabial Folds
Nasolabial Folds, Wrinkles
Primary: Non-inferiority of the Delta of the WSRS Score Between W24 and Baseline for TEOSYAL® RHA Ultra Deep Versus Perlane-L® for the Correction of Moderate to Severe…
Phase 3 N=787 A Safety and Efficacy Study of OnabotulinumtoxinA in Upper Facial Rhytides
Facial Rhytides · Glabellar Rhytides
Primary: Percentage of Subjects With ≥2-Grade Improvement From Baseline on Both the Investigator's and Subject's Facial Wrinkle Scale (FWS) Ratings of Forehead Line Severity at…
Phase 4 N=101 Prospective Evaluation of Facial Cosmetic Procedures
Cosmetic Techniques
Primary: Patient Satisfaction With Validated FACE-Q Aesthetics Survey — 28.0; 24.0; 36.0; 36.0 score on a scale
Phase 4 N=30 Emervel for the Correction of Lower Face Wrinkles & Folds
Nasolabial Folds · Marionette Lines · Wrinkles
Primary: Number of Subjects With Naturalness of Expression in Motion (2D Video) — 30 Participants
Phase 3 N=26 Lateral Canthal Rhytides With Medium Depth Chemical Peel With or Without Pretreatment With Botulinum Toxin A
Wrinkles
Primary: Posttreament Results of Chemical Peel if Botox A is Added as Pre-treatment — 1; 2 Units on a wrinkle severity scale — p=.002
N/A N=49 Prospective Pellevé™ Neck Wrinkle Study
Facial and Neck Rhytides
Primary: Change in Neck and Facial Wrinkles Using the Fitzpatrick Wrinkle Assessment — 74 percentage of participants
N/A N=100 Efficacy and Safety of Restylane Perlane Compared to Restylane for Correction of Moderate and Severe Nasolabial Folds
Nasolabial Folds in Chinese Population
Primary: Mean Change From Baseline in Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS) at 6 Months — -0.03; 0.03 units on a scale
N/A N=60 Safety Study That Compares Perlane to Perlane With Lidocaine (Perlane-L) While Correcting Wrinkles in the Area Around Your Nose
Nasolabial Folds
Primary: Treatment Difference in VAS (Perlane Side - Perlane-L Side) With Difference in VAS >= 10 mm — 95 Participants
N/A N=140 Effectiveness and Safety of Restylane Lyft Lidocaine for Jawline Definition
Jawline Definition
Primary: Percentage of Responders Having At Least a 1-Grade Improvement From Baseline on Both Jawlines Concurrently Based on Galderma Jawline Scale (GJS) at Month 3 as Assessed…
Phase 4 N=58 Sequential Treatment With BELKYRA® Then Juvéderm® VOLUMA™ With Lidocaine for Overall Improvement in Jawline Contour
Contour
Primary: Percentage of Participants Who Showed ≥ 1-point Jawline Improvement From Baseline on the Allergan Loss of Jawline Definition Scale (ALJDS), as Assessed by the…
N/A N=16 Jowl Improvement With Injectable Fillers
Jowls
Primary: Blinded Physician Jawline Rating Scale (JRS) Assessment on Scale of 0 to 4 at Baseline Versus 4 Weeks After Last Injection. — 2.214; 2.071; 1.857; 1.857 score on a scale…
N/A N=80 A Prospective, Open Label Study Evaluating JUVÉDERM® VOLBELLA With Lidocaine Treatment for the Correction of Skin Depressions in the Infra-orbital Area
Infra-orbital Skin Depressions
Primary: Percentage of Subjects With a ≥1 Grade Improvement From Baseline in Infra-Orbital Area on the Allergan Infra-Orbital Rating Scale (AIRS) on the Right and Left Side — 99…
N/A N=168 Restylane Volyme for Correction of Midface Volume Deficit and/or Midface Contour Deficiency
Midface Volume Deficit
Primary: Percentage of Responders — 80; 87.2; 76.7 percentage of subjects
Phase 4 N=125 A Study of Subject Satisfaction With BOTOX® Cosmetic Treatment in Facial Rhytides
Facial Rhytides
Primary: Percentage of Participants Satisfied With Treatment of Glabellar Lines Assessed Using the Facial Line Satisfaction Questionnaire (FLSQ) — 81.7; 0.0 Percentage of…
Phase 4 N=37 Assessment and Augmentation of Lip Appearance in Specific Study Populations
Lip Aging · Lip Augmentation · Lip
Primary: Change in Lip Vessel's Thickness — 0.833; 0.360 µm
N/A N=51 Clinical Study Evaluating the Safety and Effectiveness of The Tixel Fractional System in The Treatment of Periorbital Wrinkles
Wrinkle · Periorbital · Tixel 2
Primary: Percentage of Participants With Safety Adverse Events — 3.92 Percentage of Participants
N/A N=51 TriActive+ Radiofrequency (RF) for Non-Invasive Treatment of Wrinkles and Rhytides
Wrinkles · Rhytides
Primary: Changes to the Surface by Visual and Photographic Analysis. — 41 participants
N/A N=30 RHA® 4 With New Anesthetic - Nasolabial Folds
Aging · Pain
Primary: Non-inferiority of RHA® 4 With New Anesthetic Agent Versus RHA® 4-Lidocaine in Terms of Reducing Pain During Device Injection Into Nasolabial Folds. — 17.1; 16.3 mm…
N/A N=25 TriActive+ Radiofrequency (RF) for Non-invasive Treatment of Wrinkles & Rhytides
Wrinkles · Rhytides
Primary: Fitzpatrick Classification of Wrinkling and Degree of Elastosis. — 5.6; 5.56; 5.36; 5.32 Fitzpatrick Classification Scale
Phase 4 N=18 Rejuvenation of the Lower Eyelid Using a Combination of Two Hyaluronic Acid Fillers - a Pilot Study
Infraorbital Hollows
Primary: The Primary Objective of This Study is to Determine the Efficacy and Longevity of the Use of Restylane® and Perlane® in Combination for the Rejuvenation of the…
N/A N=14 Study of a New Technique to Improve the Symptoms of Orofacial Discomfort in Patients With Peripheral Facial Paralysis
Peripheral Nerve Facial Nerve Paralysis · Facial Nerve Diseases · Orofacial Pain
Primary: The Visual Analog Scale for Pain Was Used to Grade Discomfort in Chewing After the Installation of Facial Paralysis. Level Zero is the Lack of Discomfort and 10 is the…
N/A N=25 Fractional Radiofrequency for the Treatment and Reduction of Facial Wrinkles
Rhytides · Wrinkle
Primary: Subject Satisfaction — 2.8 score on a scale