Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=37 Randomized Prevention

The Acceptability and Feasibility of an ED-based, Peer-delivered, Suicide Safety Planning Intervention

Suicidal Ideation · Suicide, Attempted · Mental Health Issue

Enrolled (actual)
37
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Jan 2022
Primary outcome: Primary: Number of Suicidal Ideology (SI) Participants Who Agree to Receive a Safety Plan — 15; 16 Participants

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
Peer Supporter Safety Planning (Other)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
University of Arkansas
Primary completion
Sep 2020

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Number of Suicidal Ideology (SI) Participants Who Agree to Receive a Safety Plan
15; 16
PRIMARY
Proportion of Eligible Patients
17; 20
PRIMARY
Quality of Safety Plans
8; 12.5
PRIMARY
Satisfaction With Safety Planning
4; 4.5

Summary

Safety planning is a brief, ED-feasible intervention which has been demonstrated to save lives, and has been universally recommended by every recent expert consensus panel on suicide prevention strategies. In one popular version of the safety plan developed by Stanley et al, the patient is encouraged to write out the following items: identifying personal signs of a crisis; helpful internal coping strategies; social contacts or settings which may distract from a crisis; using family members or friends for help when in crisis; mental health professionals who can be contacted when in crisis; and restricting access to lethal means. In most emergency departments, safety-planning is done by clinical personnel such as psychologists or social workers, but these providers are often too busy to perform safety-planning well or have multiple other patient care responsibilities. This study aims to find out if ED patients prefer to complete a safety plan with a peer supporter or clinical personnel. People who are visiting the emergency department for thoughts of self-harm will be asked to participate.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Patients presenting for suicidal ideation (SI) or after a suicide attempt to the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (UAMS) Emergency Department (ED)
  • Willingness to engage in safety planning with trained non-clinical staff
  • English-speaking and English-writing (as translators will not be available for this study)

Exclusion Criteria

  • 89 years of age
  • Patients appearing critically-ill
  • Incarcerated or in police custody
  • Currently intoxicated with alcohol or other substance
  • ED staff objection to patient enrollment in study
  • Unwilling or unable to complete the safety plan with a peer supporter
  • Unwilling or unable to show the safety plan to clinical staff
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04068142). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search