N/A
N=37
The Acceptability and Feasibility of an ED-based, Peer-delivered, Suicide Safety Planning Intervention
Suicidal Ideation · Suicide, Attempted · Mental Health Issue
Bottom Line
View on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04068142 ↗Enrolled (actual)
37
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Jan 2022
Primary outcome: Primary: Number of Suicidal Ideology (SI) Participants Who Agree to Receive a Safety Plan — 15; 16 Participants
Study Design & Population
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- N/A
- Interventions
- Peer Supporter Safety Planning (Other)
- Age
- Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
- Sex
- All
- Sponsor
- University of Arkansas
- Primary completion
- Sep 2020
Outcome Measures
| Outcome | Result | p-value |
|---|---|---|
| PRIMARY Number of Suicidal Ideology (SI) Participants Who Agree to Receive a Safety Plan |
15; 16 | — |
| PRIMARY Proportion of Eligible Patients |
17; 20 | — |
| PRIMARY Quality of Safety Plans |
8; 12.5 | — |
| PRIMARY Satisfaction With Safety Planning |
4; 4.5 | — |
Summary
Safety planning is a brief, ED-feasible intervention which has been demonstrated to save lives, and has been universally recommended by every recent expert consensus panel on suicide prevention strategies. In one popular version of the safety plan developed by Stanley et al, the patient is encouraged to write out the following items: identifying personal signs of a crisis; helpful internal coping strategies; social contacts or settings which may distract from a crisis; using family members or friends for help when in crisis; mental health professionals who can be contacted when in crisis; and restricting access to lethal means. In most emergency departments, safety-planning is done by clinical personnel such as psychologists or social workers, but these providers are often too busy to perform safety-planning well or have multiple other patient care responsibilities.
This study aims to find out if ED patients prefer to complete a safety plan with a peer supporter or clinical personnel. People who are visiting the emergency department for thoughts of self-harm will be asked to participate.
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- Patients presenting for suicidal ideation (SI) or after a suicide attempt to the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (UAMS) Emergency Department (ED)
- Willingness to engage in safety planning with trained non-clinical staff
- English-speaking and English-writing (as translators will not be available for this study)
Exclusion Criteria
- 89 years of age
- Patients appearing critically-ill
- Incarcerated or in police custody
- Currently intoxicated with alcohol or other substance
- ED staff objection to patient enrollment in study
- Unwilling or unable to complete the safety plan with a peer supporter
- Unwilling or unable to show the safety plan to clinical staff
Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04068142). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.