Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A N=234 Supportive Care

LifeBio Memory Digital Reminiscence Platform

Dementia · Cognitive Impairment

Enrolled (actual)
234
Serious AEs
0.0%
Results posted
Oct 2025
Primary outcome: Primary: Change in Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) From Baseline — 7.04; 6.09 score on a scale — p=0.020

Study Design & Population

Study type
Interventional
Phase
N/A
Interventions
LifeBio Memory (Other)
Age
Adult, Older Adult · 18+ yrs
Sex
All
Sponsor
Benjamin Rose Institute on Aging
Primary completion
Mar 2024

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Change in Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) From Baseline
7.04; 6.09 0.020 sig
PRIMARY
Change in Satisfaction With Care in the Nursing Home Scale From Baseline
6.95; 6.84 0.223
PRIMARY
Change in Quality of Life Alzheimer's Disease (QoL-AD) From Baseline
35.60; 34.70 0.036 sig
PRIMARY
Change in Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI) - Short Form From Baseline
17.13; 16.23 0.131
PRIMARY
Change in Staff Attitudes Towards Residents Scale From Baseline
16.43; 16.32 0.351
PRIMARY
Change in Individualized Care Instrument (ICI) Subscale - Knowing the Person - From Baseline
41.09; 42.15 0.08
PRIMARY
Change in The UCLA 3-Item Loneliness Scale From Baseline
4.50; 4.46 0.400
PRIMARY
Resident Satisfaction With the LifeBio Memory Program
6.42
PRIMARY
Change in Perceived Importance of Life Story Work Among Staff
13.32; 12.79 0.011 sig
PRIMARY
Staff Satisfaction With LifeBio Memory Program
33.57
PRIMARY
Change in Sense of Competence in Dementia Care Staff (SCIDS) Scale From Baseline
55.35; 55.48 0.459
PRIMARY
Change in Person-Centered Care Assessment Tool [Sub-Scales I and II] From Baseline
39.70; 37.96 0.033 sig
PRIMARY
Change in Direct Care Worker Job Satisfaction Scale From Baseline
27.66; 26.85 0.103
PRIMARY
Change in Individualized Care Instrument (ICI) Subscale - Resident Autonomy Subscale - From Baseline
58.46; 58.44 0.494
PRIMARY
Change in Individualized Care Instrument (ICI) Subscale - Staff and Resident Communication Subscale - From Baseline
20.72; 21.15 0.214
PRIMARY
Change in Individualized Care Instrument (ICI) Subscale - Staff to Staff Communication Subscale - From Baseline
27.02; 26.30 0.199
PRIMARY
Staff Perceptions About the Feasibility of the LifeBio Memory Program Protocol
26.26
SECONDARY
Change in Mini Mental Status Examination (MMSE) From Baseline
21.07; 19.72
SECONDARY
Change in Staff Adequate Knowledge of Residents' Care Preferences From Baseline
2.76; 3.54 <.001 sig
SECONDARY
Change in Staff Adequate Knowledge of Residents' Life Stories From Baseline
2.68; 3.58 <.001 sig

Summary

Non-pharmacological interventions and person-centered care strategies are important elements of care for people with Alzheimer's disease and related dementias. Life story work, which uses written and oral life histories to elicit conversation and memories, is an effective intervention for individuals with dementia; however, because of the time-consuming nature of generating useful life story materials, has not been widely implemented in nursing homes and other care environments. LifeBio Inc. will develop an easy-to-use reminiscence therapy platform - LifeBio MemoryTM - with a novel machine-learning-based application that converts speech to text and generates life stories to serve as an interactive tool to cultivate communication between people living with dementia and their family and caregivers.

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria (Staff):

  • Work within a residential care facility participating in the study
  • Speak and read English
  • Able to provide own transportation to and from interviews with residents

Inclusion Criteria (Residents

  • Must reside within a participating residential care facility
  • Must be at least 55 years of Age
  • Must speak and read English
  • Have a Dementia diagnosis
  • Have a Score of at least 15 on the Mini Mental State Examination

Exclusion Criteria (Residents)

  • Residents will be excluded from the study if they show signs of rapid cognitive decline or physical deterioration over the last 6 months, as evidence by information gained during screening.
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04769466). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication.

Back to search