Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up
N/A Completed N=538 Randomized Prevention

StriveWeekly Online Mental Health Trial Post-pandemic

Anxiety · Depressive Symptoms · Stress, Emotional
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04927845 ↗
Enrolled (actual)
538
Serious AEs
Results posted
Sep 2024
Primary outcomePrimary: Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS-21) — 16.9; 16.3; 16.5; 18.3 score on a scale — p=.008

Summary

With the COVID-19 pandemic completely altering the landscape of higher education, students have been experiencing more stress than ever. With Harvard University's plan for students to return to campus for the 2021-2022 academic year, offering an online mental health program such as StriveWeekly could provide students with stress management support as they transition back after 1.5 years of remote learning. This study will use a randomized controlled trial design to test the effectiveness of a waitlist versus StriveWeekly. This study will allow us to test if a program that has previously demonstrated effectiveness with university students in reducing anxiety and depression symptoms will still be effective after the unprecedented amount of stressors during a global pandemic. Primary aim: We aim to evaluate the effectiveness of StriveWeekly in preventing or reducing symptoms of anxiety and depression. The use of a waitlist condition will allow us to experimentally assess if the online intervention is responsible for decreasing / preventing worsened anxiety, depression, and stress symptoms over time. Given the previously established effectiveness of StriveWeekly as an indicated prevention program, we expect students in the intervention condition to experience significantly better symptoms compared to the waitlist from baseline to posttest. Alternatively, if the transition back from remote learning and/or the broad pandemic context interferes with the acceptability or effectiveness of StriveWeekly, then we might expect to see little to no significant differences between the online intervention condition and waitlist condition from baseline to posttest. Secondary aims include: (a) testing moderators of intervention effectiveness and (b) evaluating the intervention in terms of acceptability (e.g., feedback on program name; demographically representativeness of student user sample; satisfactory adherence and satisfaction rates). Exploratory moderation analyses across groups will help determine whether or not the intervention condition produces unique or additive effects for students with certain characteristics over and above changes demonstrated by similar students in the waitlist condition. Acceptability analyses will allow for more nuanced evaluation of StriveWeekly's effectiveness as a program, beyond its ability to facilitate symptom reduction.

Outcome Measures

OutcomeResultp-value
PRIMARY
Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS-21)
16.9; 16.3; 16.5; 18.3 .008 sig
SECONDARY
Perceived Stress Scale
19.1; 18.5; 18.7; 18.8 .21
SECONDARY
The Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scales
23.1; 23.3; 22.8; 22.1 .046 sig

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • enrolled as a student at Harvard College (academic year 2021-2022)

Exclusion Criteria

  • invalid data reporting (e.g., straight-lined responses to surveys)
View full record on ClinicalTrials.gov →

Data sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04927845). Outcome figures and adverse-event rates are extracted automatically from the registry's posted results and are provided for clinician reference, not as a substitute for the primary publication. Informational only — not medical advice.

Back to search