Clinical Trial Search

Primary: Leg Length Inequality — 0.3; 0.58 centemeter

Primary: Low Back Pain Prevalence — 16; 26 participants — p=p=0.001

Primary: Numerical Rating Scale (0-10), an Interval Pain Scale, on Which 0 Indicates no Pain and 10 Indicates the Worst Pain Imaginable — 7.1; 5.8 units on a scale

Primary: Change From Baseline in Daily Low Back Pain Intensity (LBPI) Score as Measured by an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) at Week 4 — -1.19; -1.03; -1.45 units on a scale

Primary: Walking Distance — 1,134.24 meters

Primary: Symptoms of Chronic Lower Back Pain as Measured With the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) — 26.32; 20.45 percentage of change from baseline to 5

Primary: Lower Back Strength-Extension — 54.5; 50.2; 49.2; 57.5 kg-Force

Primary: Participant-reported "Flares" of Low Back Pain (Aim 1) — 7.3 Mean flares per year

Primary: Participants' Level of Low Back Pain-associated Disability as Assessed by Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) — -1.29; -0.08 score on a scale — p=<0.05

Primary: Percent of Maximal Voluntary Isometric Contraction (%MVIC) — 226.41; 250.51; 162.47; 205.82 % of Max Voluntary Isometric Contraction

Primary: Change in Oswestry Disability Index From Baseline to 10 Weeks — -8.8; -6.1 Units on a scale — p=0.02

Primary: Change in Pain: Visual Analog Scale (VAS) — 2.1 units on a scale (centimeters)

Primary: Number of Patients Who Reported Transition From Acute to Chronic Low Back Pain (cLBP) — 312; 318 Participants

Primary: Intensity of Low Back Pain (LBP) Self-Estimated by Visual Analogical Scale (VAS) — 4.5; 4.2; 5.4; 3.9 milimeters

Primary: Difference in the Proportion of Primary Outcome Successes Between Treatment Groups — 27; 9 participants — p=<0.00001

Primary: Change in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Interference 4a Between Week 6 (T2) to Week 15 (T3) — -0.9; -1.8; -1.6; -2.0 score on a…

Primary: Pain Severity: Visual Analog Scale — 7.26; 7.75; 7.8; 7.62 score on a scale

Primary: Percentage of Participants Whose Change in Pain Rating on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Met the Individual Subject Success Criteria — 21; 8 Participants — p=<0.005

Primary: Low Back Pain at Resting Status — 30.58; 37.50; 30.00; 41.92 score on a scale

Primary: Change From Baseline in Oswestry Disability Scale (0-100%) — -8.26; -7.75; -8.00; -9.48 units on a scale

Primary: Change From Baseline to 12 Weeks in Brief Pain Inventory 24-hour Average Pain Score — -2.48; -1.80 units on a scale — p=0.001

Primary: Low Back Pain Disability — 12.1; 19.6 Oswestry Disability %

Primary: Flexion-relaxation Ratio — 0.68 Ratio

Primary: Intervention Erector Spinae Stiffness Change — -10.959 Newton metres (Nm) — p=<0.05

Primary: Change From Baseline to 11 Weeks in Oswestry Disability Scale (0-100%) — -11.06; -9.10 units on a scale — p=<.0001

Primary: Change in Functional Impairment as Measured by the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire — 11.1; 11.9 units on a scale

Primary: Change in Low Back Pain — 2.58; 1.80 units on a scale

Primary: Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) — 1.18; 2.84; 3.13 units on a scale

Primary: Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) — 15.1; 15.0; 13.7; 4.6 Scores on a scale

Primary: Pain Ratings — 3.60; 4.69; 4.83; 5.41 units on a scale — p=.05