N/A N=52 Lifting and Tightening of the Face in Subjects With Skin of Darker Color
Facial Skin Laxity
Primary: Change in Overall Lifting and Tightening of Treated Tissue
Clinical Trial Search
Completed trials with posted results — search by concept, filter by the parameters that matter at the bedside.
N/A N=32 Lifting and Tightening of the Face and Neck Following an Increased Density Treatment
Skin Laxity
Primary: Improvement in Overall Lifting and Tightening of Skin — 48 percentage of participants improved
N/A N=64 Lifting and Tightening of the Face and Neck Utilizing the Ulthera® System
Facial and Neck Skin Laxity
Primary: Improvement in Overall Lifting and Tightening of the Jowls and/or Neck Laxity — 22; 10; 1; 11 participants
Phase 2 N=45 Efficacy and Safety Study of Fibrin Sealant With 4 IU/mL Thrombin, Vapor Heated, Solvent Detergent Treated (FS VH S/D 4) in Face-Lift Procedures
Facial Rhytidectomy (Face-lift)
Primary: Visual Comparison of Ecchymosis at Postoperative Day 3 — 5; 12; 11; 0 participants — p=0.143
N/A N=50 Thermage CPT for Treatment of Facial and Neck Laxity
Skin Aging
Primary: Improvement in Laxity — 0.6; 1.0; 0.9; 1.3 units on a scale
N/A N=60 Open-label, Prospective Evaluation of the Ulthera® System for Lifting Submental (Under the Chin) and Neck Tissue in Chinese Patients
Mild to Moderate Skin Laxity Under the Chin · Mild to Moderate Skin Laxity on Neck
Primary: Mean Change From Baseline in Overall Lifting and Tightening of Submental (Under the Chin) and Neck Tissue Area at Day 90 Post-treatment — -14.4; -7.9; -22.3 square…
N/A N=103 Evaluation of the Ulthera™ System for Obtaining Lift and Tightening of the Cheek Tissue
Mild to Moderate Skin Laxity on Cheek · Mild to Moderate Skin Laxity on Upper Neck · Mild to Moderate Subcutaneous Fat on Cheek
Primary: Change in Overall Lifting and Tightening of Treated Tissue on the Lower Face and Submental Regions. — 68.60 percentage of participants improved
N/A N=50 Effectiveness and Safety of the Octave System for Lifting the Eyebrow and Improving the Appearance of the Face and Neck
Eyebrow Lift · Improved Appearance of the Face and Neck
Primary: Percentage of Treated Subjects With Eyebrow Lift at Day 90 — 80.0; 67.5 percentage of subjects
N/A N=14 Histological Evaluation of Human Skin Bx to Assess the Effects of APR Tx as an Adjunct Procedure in Facelift Surgery
Skin Laxity · Tissue Degeneration · Tissue Breakdown
Primary: Analysis of Elasticity (Collagen & Elastin) — 1.7; 0.5; 1.5; 0.5 units on a scale
Phase 4 N=101 Prospective Evaluation of Facial Cosmetic Procedures
Cosmetic Techniques
Primary: Patient Satisfaction With Validated FACE-Q Aesthetics Survey — 28.0; 24.0; 36.0; 36.0 score on a scale
N/A N=72 Safety and Effectiveness Evaluation of the Device in Achieving Submental Lift
Skin Laxity
Primary: Tissue Lift at the Submental Area Measuring >/= 20 mm2 — 56.9 percentage of participants — p=0.05
N/A N=20 Perioral Rejuvenation and Upper Lip Enhancement
Perioral Rejuvenation · Upper Lip Projection
Primary: Nasal Tip Projection — 0.601 ratio
Phase 4 N=30 Emervel for the Correction of Lower Face Wrinkles & Folds
Nasolabial Folds · Marionette Lines · Wrinkles
Primary: Number of Subjects With Naturalness of Expression in Motion (2D Video) — 30 Participants
Phase 3 N=75 Efficacy and Safety of FS VH S/D 4 S-apr for Flap Adherence in Rhytidectomy
Face-lift · Facial Rhytidectomy
Primary: Total Volume of Drainage on Each Side of the Face — 20.0; 8.0 mL — p=<0.0001
N/A N=2 The PREFORM Study: Rotational Fractional Resection for Submental Contouring
Skin Laxity · Lipodystrophy
Primary: Number of Participants Who Had at Least One Grade Improvement on the Submental Skin Laxity Scale — 2 Participants
N/A N=82 Renuvion APR Device to Improve the Appearance of Lax Tissue in the Neck and Submental Region
Lax Skin
Primary: Day 180 Number of Participants With Improvement Measured By Independent Photographic Review — 6; 52 Participants — p=<0.0001
N/A N=68 CONFORM: Rotational Fractional Resection for Submental Contouring
Skin Laxity · Lipodystrophy
Primary: Number of Participants With a Reduction of Submental Skin Area ≥ 20 mm^2 — 49 Participants
N/A N=10 Study To Evaluate The Safety And Efficacy Of The MyEllevate® Procedure
Soft Tissue Approximation · Elevation of Subdermis · Elevation of Underlying Muscle
Primary: Physician Global Aesthetic Improvement Score (PGAIS) — 5; 3; 2; 0 Participants
N/A N=25 Clinical Study on the Application of a Non-Invasive Micro-Focused Ultrasound With Visualization System for Skin Laxity (ULT-215)
Facial Skin Laxity
Primary: Number of Participants With Improvement in Skin Laxity in Submental Region and Neck at Day 90 — 8 Participants
N/A N=201 Evaluation of the Effectiveness and Safety of the Ulthera® DeepSEE® System for Treating Skin Laxity in the Lower Face and Submentum
Improvement in Skin Laxity of the Lower Face and Submentum
Primary: Percentage of Subjects With Improvement in Lower Face and Submental Skin Laxity at Day 90 — 54.2; 47.0 percentage of subjects
N/A N=85 Treatment With the Evoke System for Facial and Submental Laxity
Laxity; Skin
Primary: Evaluate Change in Skin Appearance — 80.7 percentage of participants
N/A N=49 Prospective Pellevé™ Neck Wrinkle Study
Facial and Neck Rhytides
Primary: Change in Neck and Facial Wrinkles Using the Fitzpatrick Wrinkle Assessment — 74 percentage of participants
N/A N=60 Pan Facial Volume Restoration
Volume Loss (Soft Tissue Ptosis or Atrophy )
Primary: Mean Change From Baseline in Volume Loss Assessment — -0.8 Score on a scale
Phase 2 N=20 Combination Facial Aesthetic Treatment in Millennials
Dermatological Non-Disease
Primary: FACE-Q Satisfaction With Facial Appearance Overall Scale — 42.35; 59.42 score on a scale
N/A N=140 Effectiveness and Safety of Restylane Lyft Lidocaine for Jawline Definition
Jawline Definition
Primary: Percentage of Responders Having At Least a 1-Grade Improvement From Baseline on Both Jawlines Concurrently Based on Galderma Jawline Scale (GJS) at Month 3 as Assessed…
N/A N=16 Jowl Improvement With Injectable Fillers
Jowls
Primary: Blinded Physician Jawline Rating Scale (JRS) Assessment on Scale of 0 to 4 at Baseline Versus 4 Weeks After Last Injection. — 2.214; 2.071; 1.857; 1.857 score on a scale…
N/A N=60 Injection Technique Assessment of Restylane Lyft With Lidocaine for Cheek Augmentation
Cheek Augmentation · Midface Contour Deficiencies
Primary: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events [Safety] — 5 Participants
Phase 4 N=30 Effect of a Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) Device on Overall Facial Appearance
Ageing
Primary: Evaluate Overall Facial Improvement Assessed Live by the Investigator and Subjects Using the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) at 12 Weeks Compared to Baseline…
N/A N=77 Global Management of Facial Rejuvenation With a New Range of Hyaluronic Acid Dermal Fillers
Facial Wrinkles
Primary: Full Face Global Aesthetic Improvement — 2.5 units on a scale
Phase 4 N=64 Study to Evaluate Subject Satisfaction With Facial Appearance and Impact of Combined Facial Treatment
Facial Rhytides · Skin Folds · Loss of Volume and Skin Quality
Primary: Change From Baseline in the Rasch-transformed Score of the FACE-Q Satisfaction With Facial Appearance Scale. — 46.6 units on a scale — p=<0.0001