Phase 4 N=101 Prospective Evaluation of Facial Cosmetic Procedures
Cosmetic Techniques
Primary: Patient Satisfaction With Validated FACE-Q Aesthetics Survey — 28.0; 24.0; 36.0; 36.0 score on a scale
Clinical Trial Search
Completed trials with posted results — search by concept, filter by the parameters that matter at the bedside.
Phase 4 N=25 Changing in Skin Physiology After Microdroplet Placement of Stabilized Hyaluronic Acid in Aging Faces
Aging
Primary: Hydration Level — 53.19; 46.75 AU (arbitrary unit) — p=<0.05
Phase 4 N=30 Emervel for the Correction of Lower Face Wrinkles & Folds
Nasolabial Folds · Marionette Lines · Wrinkles
Primary: Number of Subjects With Naturalness of Expression in Motion (2D Video) — 30 Participants
N/A N=60 Pan Facial Volume Restoration
Volume Loss (Soft Tissue Ptosis or Atrophy )
Primary: Mean Change From Baseline in Volume Loss Assessment — -0.8 Score on a scale
N/A N=168 Restylane Volyme for Correction of Midface Volume Deficit and/or Midface Contour Deficiency
Midface Volume Deficit
Primary: Percentage of Responders — 80; 87.2; 76.7 percentage of subjects
N/A N=14 Histological Evaluation of Human Skin Bx to Assess the Effects of APR Tx as an Adjunct Procedure in Facelift Surgery
Skin Laxity · Tissue Degeneration · Tissue Breakdown
Primary: Analysis of Elasticity (Collagen & Elastin) — 1.7; 0.5; 1.5; 0.5 units on a scale
N/A N=16 Jowl Improvement With Injectable Fillers
Jowls
Primary: Blinded Physician Jawline Rating Scale (JRS) Assessment on Scale of 0 to 4 at Baseline Versus 4 Weeks After Last Injection. — 2.214; 2.071; 1.857; 1.857 score on a scale…
N/A N=205 Sculptra for Correction of Midface Volume Deficit and/or Midface Contour Deficiency
Midface Volume Deficit
Primary: Percentage of Participants With 1 Point Improvement From Baseline on the Medicis Midface Volume Scale (MMVS) as Measured by the Blinded Evaluator at Month 12 — 68.8…
N/A N=32 Lifting and Tightening of the Face and Neck Following an Increased Density Treatment
Skin Laxity
Primary: Improvement in Overall Lifting and Tightening of Skin — 48 percentage of participants improved
N/A N=110 Saypha® Volume LIdocaine in Nasolabial Folds
Moderate to Severe Nasolabial Folds
Primary: Responder Rate in Reduction of Nasolabial Folds — 34; 39; 73 Participants
N/A N=20 Radio Frequency Microneedling for Suprapatellar Skin
Skin Laxity
Primary: Photographic Knee Laxity and Texture Evaluation — 1.87; 2.02 score on a scale
N/A N=20 Assess the Impact of Lip Rejuvenation on Projected First Impressions and Mood Perceptions
Lip Rejuvenation
Primary: First Impressions — 46.756; 27.769; 46.391; 34.404 score on a scale
N/A N=77 Global Management of Facial Rejuvenation With a New Range of Hyaluronic Acid Dermal Fillers
Facial Wrinkles
Primary: Full Face Global Aesthetic Improvement — 2.5 units on a scale
N/A N=202 RHA Redensity - Perioral Rhytids
Perioral Rhytids · Aging · Wrinkle
Primary: Change From Baseline in Perioral Rhytids Severity Rating Scale (PR-SRS) Score Rated by the Blinded Live Evaluator (BLE) at Week 8 After Last Treatment. — 121; 4; 29; 47…
N/A N=62 Princess® VOLUME Lidocaine for the Correction of Nasolabial Folds
Nasolabial Fold, Hypoplastic
Primary: NLF-SRS Grade of Nasolabial Folds Change — -1.50 score on a scale
Phase 4 N=53 A Study to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Juvéderm® VOLIFT®™ With Lidocaine for Dynamic Radial Cheek Line Skin Depressions
Cheek Line Depressions
Primary: Percentage of Participants by Improvement Rating (Improved and Not Improved) of Their Dynamic Radial Cheek Lines as Assessed by the Participant Using the Global…
N/A N=115 The Volumizing Effect of Juvéderm VOLUMA® in the Mid-Face
Age-related Volume Deficit in the Mid-face
Primary: Subject Experience Measured by Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire — 1.94; 1.62; 1.51 Units on a scale
N/A N=52 Lifting and Tightening of the Face in Subjects With Skin of Darker Color
Facial Skin Laxity
Primary: Change in Overall Lifting and Tightening of Treated Tissue
N/A N=209 JUVÉDERM® VOLITE™ XC for Cheek Skin Smoothness
Skin Smoothness of the Cheeks
Primary: Percentage of Participants With at Least 1-point Improvement (Decrease) From Baseline on the Allergan Cheek Smoothness Scale (ACSS) on Both Cheeks at Month 1 — 4.5; 57.9…
N/A N=120 Comparison of Redermic, Rejuva-A and Combination of Both Redermic and Rejuva-A in Subjects With Signs of Aging
Skin Aging
Primary: Skin Aging Measured With the Photonumeric Scale. — 21.25; 21.36; 21.21; 21.03 Units on a scale
N/A N=207 Safety, Effectiveness and Participant Satisfaction Study of a Dermal Filler (of RADIESSE® (+) Lidocaine) in the Treatment of Ageing Signs in the Face
Signs of Facial Aging With Volume Loss in the Upper Cheeks, Nasolabial Folds and Marionette Lines
Primary: Responder Rate for Nasolabial Folds Based on the Blinded Rater's Evaluation on the Merz Nasolabial Folds Scale (MNLFS) at Week 12/16 (Depending on Touch-up) — 93.6…
Phase 4 N=58 Sequential Treatment With BELKYRA® Then Juvéderm® VOLUMA™ With Lidocaine for Overall Improvement in Jawline Contour
Contour
Primary: Percentage of Participants Who Showed ≥ 1-point Jawline Improvement From Baseline on the Allergan Loss of Jawline Definition Scale (ALJDS), as Assessed by the…
Phase 3 N=168 JUVÉDERM® VOLUMA® With Lidocaine for Correction of Temple Hollowing in Chinese Population
Temple Hollowing
Primary: Number of Participants With Adverse Events — 23; 59; 1; 2 Participants
Phase 4 N=18 Rejuvenation of the Lower Eyelid Using a Combination of Two Hyaluronic Acid Fillers - a Pilot Study
Infraorbital Hollows
Primary: The Primary Objective of This Study is to Determine the Efficacy and Longevity of the Use of Restylane® and Perlane® in Combination for the Rejuvenation of the…
N/A N=126 A Safety and Effectiveness Study of JUVÉDERM VOLIFT® XC Versus Control for Moderate to Severe Nasolabial Folds
Moderate to Severe Nasolabial Folds
Primary: Mean Change From Baseline in Nasolabial Fold Severity Using the 5-Point Nasolabial Fold Severity Scale (NLFSS) — 2.6; 2.6; 1.4; 1.3 Scores on a Scale
N/A N=50 Thermage CPT for Treatment of Facial and Neck Laxity
Skin Aging
Primary: Improvement in Laxity — 0.6; 1.0; 0.9; 1.3 units on a scale
Phase 2 N=20 Combination Facial Aesthetic Treatment in Millennials
Dermatological Non-Disease
Primary: FACE-Q Satisfaction With Facial Appearance Overall Scale — 42.35; 59.42 score on a scale
Phase 3 N=25 Assess Aesthetic Improvement With QM1114-DP in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Lateral Canthal Lines and Glabellar Lines
Glabellar Frown Lines · Canthal Lines
Primary: Responders Rate Using the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) at Maximum Frown (Glabellar Lines) — 100 percentage of participants
N/A N=11 A Study to Evaluate The Impact on Skin Quality Attributes by Juvederm® Volite Injection on Healthy Volunteers
Healthy Adults · Skin Enhancement
Primary: Change From Baseline in Skin Hydration as Measured by MoistureMeterD® 0.5 mm — 1.7; -0.0; 1.2; 0.6 tissue dielectric constant — p=0.0736
N/A N=15 Clinical Assessment of Skin Tightening and Contour Change of Submental Tissue Using Bipolar Radiofrequency Microneedling
Skin Laxity
Primary: Percent Change From Baseline of Soft Tissue Surface Area — -0.18; -017 percent change