N/A N=101 Open Versus Robotic Retromuscular Ventral Hernia Repair
Ventral Hernia
Primary: Composite Outcome of Diagnosis of Surgical Site Occurrence or Infection, Hospital Readmission, or Hernia Recurrence — 9; 9 Participants
Clinical Trial Search
Completed trials with posted results — search by concept, filter by the parameters that matter at the bedside.
N/A N=299 Lichtenstein Patch or Prolene Hernia System (PHS) for Inguinal Hernia Repair
Chronic Pain
Primary: Long-term Sequelae — 10; 13 percentage of participants
N/A N=124 Modified "Open Intraperitoneal Mesh" Technique of Incisional Ventral Hernia Repair
Incisional Ventral Hernia · Recurrent Ventral Hernia
Primary: Number of Early Postoperative Complications (Wound Infections, Seroma, Hematoma) — 9; 21; 2; 92 participants
N/A N=58 Comparative Study on Self-adhesive Mesh for Open Inguinal Hernia Repair
Hernia, Inguinal
Primary: Operating Time From Skin Incision to Wound Closure — 39.2; 47.7 minutes
N/A N=100 Inguinal Hernia Study Using Biodesign IHM
Inguinal Hernia
Primary: Number of Patients With Inguinal Hernia Recurrence — 3; 0 participants — p=0.11
N/A N=24 A Prospective Case Series Evaluating Surgimend Mp® In Patients Undergoing Complex Abdominal Hernia Repair
Hernia, Ventral
Primary: The Frequency of Hernia Recurrence Diagnosed by Physical Exam or CT Scan (if Clinically Indicated) — 1 Participants
N/A N=77 Preoperative Etanercept Before Inguinal Hernia Surgery
Inguinal Hernia · Postoperative Pain
Primary: Numerical Rating Scale Pain Score — 3.3; 3.9 units on a scale
N/A N=75 Laparoscopic vs. Robotic Ventral Hernia Repair With IPOM
Ventral Hernia
Primary: Postoperative Pain Scores — 5; 5; 4; 3 score on a scale
Phase 4 N=172 Strattice in Repair of Inguinal Hernias
Hernia, Inguinal
Primary: Change From Baseline in Activities Assessment Scale at 3 Months — -7.49; -6.12 units on a scale
N/A N=56 Abdominal Binder to Reduce Pain and Seroma Formation
Ventral Hernias
Primary: Visual Analog Scale of Pain Activity — 50; 70 units on a scale
Phase 2 N=35 Comparison of Non-Surgical Treatment Options for Chronic Exertional Compartment Syndrome (CECS)
Chronic Exertional Compartment Syndrome
Primary: University of Wisconsin Running Injury and Recovery Index Score at Baseline — 10.86; 11.86; 12.14; 9.75 cumulative score on a 9-item scale
N/A N=34 Mesh Fixation and Closure of Peritoneum Following Laparoscopic Hernia Repair Using N-butyl Cyanoacrylate
Hernia, Inguinal
Primary: Number of Participants With Safe Fixation of Mesh and Closure of Peritoneum by Clinical Investigation During Hospital Stay and Telephone Interview at Six Weeks…
N/A N=83 Repair of Infected or Contaminated Hernias
Hernia
Primary: Incidence of Wound Events — 53 participants
Phase 4 N=20 Awake Caudal Catheter vs General Anesthesia
Inguinal Hernia
Primary: Number of Participants With Return to Baseline Respiratory Function. — 11; 9 Participants
N/A N=491 Urinary Retention After Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair: Comparing the Use of the Intraoperative Urinary Catheter
Inguinal Hernia
Primary: Number of Participants With Post Operative Urinary Retention — 23; 21 Participants
N/A N=104 Open Complex Ventral Incisional Hernia Repair Using Biosynthetic Material for Midline Fascial Closure Reinforcement
Ventral Incisional Hernia
Primary: Hernia Recurrence Rate — 17.3 % of subjects with recurrent hernia
N/A N=73 Complications, Outcomes and Revisions Following Hiatal Hernia Repair With MIROMESH
Hiatal Hernia With Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease · Gastroesophageal Reflux · GERD
Primary: Number of Subjects Who Required a Revision of the Index Surgery. — 0 Participants
N/A N=92 Ventral Hernia Study Using OviTex Reinforced Bioscaffold
Hernia, Ventral
Primary: Surgical Site Occurrences or Wound-related Events — 0; 10; 3; 4 Participants
N/A N=200 TAPP Inguinal Hernia Repair With Self-fixating Parietex™ ProGrip™ Mesh
Postoperative Complications
Primary: Proportion of Subjects Who Experience Hernia Recurrence (Defect Treated Initially With Parietex™ ProGrip™) Within 12 Months Post-surgery. — 3 participants
N/A N=9 SurgiMend Mesh at the Hiatus
Hiatal Hernia
Primary: Recurrence Rate — 6; 3 Participants
N/A N=115 A Clinical Trial Using Spy Elite System in Planning Tissue Advancement Flaps After Ventral Hernia Repair
Ventral Hernia
Primary: Number of Participants With Wound Complications — 16; 17 participants
Phase 4 N=37 Optimizing Surgical Conditions During Laparoscopic Herniotomy With Deep Neuromuscular Blockade
Laparoscopic Herniotomy
Primary: Improvement of Surgical Workspace — 0; 1; 0; 0 Participants
N/A N=40 Telescopic Dissection vs. Balloon Dissection During Laparoscopic TEP Inguinal Hernia Repair
Inguinal Hernia
Primary: Operative Time — 46; 43 minutes
Phase 4 N=603 Parietex Progrip Study
Hernia, Inguinal
Primary: Pain Assessment During the First Three Months and at One Year After Surgery Using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) — 7.48; 6.76; 4.62; 5.27 units on a scale
N/A N=119 Study Of Hernia Repair Utilizing The Bard Ventrio Hernia Patch
Ventral Hernia
Primary: The Primary Endpoint is the Rate of Hernia Recurrence in Study Patients. — 0 participants
Phase 1 N=10 In Vivo Optical Spectroscopy Monitoring in a New Model of Muscular Compartment Syndrome
Human Volunteers
Primary: Comparison Between INVOS Monitoring and Electromyography — 73; 46 % of StcO2
N/A N=90 A Retrospective Study With Prospective Follow-Up of Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair Utilizing the Bard Sepramesh IP Composite
Hernia
Primary: Hernia Recurrence Rate of Hernias Post Repair With Sepramesh. — 1 participants
N/A N=112 Stoma Closure and Reinforcement Trial
Colon Cancer · Rectal Cancer · Ileostomy - Stoma
Primary: Number of Participants With Wound Occurrences — 0 Participants
N/A N=126 A Prospective Study in Patients Undergoing Primary Ventral Hernia Repair Using Parietex™ Composite Ventral Patch
Hernia
Primary: Primary Hernia Recurrence Rate at 24 Month Follow-up. — 3 Participants
Phase 2 N=60 IINB vs. QLB for Elective Open Inguinal Herniorrhaphy
Nerve Block · Herniorrhaphy · Regional Anesthesia
Primary: Post-operative Verbal Pain Score With Movement — 5.10; 5.03 score on a scale