30 closest matches · ranked by relevance
Correction of Volume Loss in the Infraorbital Hollow Area
Primary: Responder Rate Compared to the Untreated Control Group According to the Merz Infraorbital Hollow Assessment Scale (MIHAS). — 81.6; 9.5 percentage of participants — p=<…
Infraorbital Hollows
Primary: Responder Rate Based on the Blinded Evaluator's Live Assessment of the Galderma Infraorbital Hollows Scale (GIHS) — 87.4; 17.7 Percentage of participants — p=<0.001
Infraorbital Hollowing
Primary: Percentage of Participants With at Least a 1-point Improvement Change From Baseline on the Allergan Infraorbital Hollows Scale (AIHS) Based on Evaluating Investigator's…
Dermal Filler · Rejuvenation
Primary: Volumetric Change in Infraorbital Treatment Baseline to Each Post-intervention Timepoint Day 14, Day 30, and Day 90 — -0.026; -0.065; -0.108 cc
Infraorbital Hollows
Primary: The Primary Objective of This Study is to Determine the Efficacy and Longevity of the Use of Restylane® and Perlane® in Combination for the Rejuvenation of the…
Infra-orbital Skin Depressions
Primary: Percentage of Subjects With a ≥1 Grade Improvement From Baseline in Infra-Orbital Area on the Allergan Infra-Orbital Rating Scale (AIRS) on the Right and Left Side — 99…
Volume Loss in the Infraorbital Hollow Area
Primary: Responder Rate Based on Merz Infraorbital Hollow Assessment Scale (MIHAS) at Week 8 — 80.6; 87.4; 73.7; 1.9 percentage of subjects
Infra-orbital Hollows · Tear-trough Deformity · Wrinkle
Primary: Change of 1 Point From Baseline in Infra-Orbital Hollows Severity Rated by the Blinded Live Evaluator (BLE) at Week 12 After Last Treatment, Using the TIOHS - Phase 1a…
Temple Hollowing
Primary: Number of Participants With Adverse Events — 23; 59; 1; 2 Participants
Temporal Hollowing
Primary: Responder Rate Based on the Blinded Evaluators' Live Assessment of the Galderma Temple Volume Deficit Scale (GTVDS) — 91.2; 9.1 percentage of participants — p=<0.001
Temple Hollowing
Primary: Percentage of Participants With ≥ 1-grade Improvement From Baseline in the Validated Allergan Temple Hollowing Scale (ATHS) Based on Evaluating Investigator (EI)…
Dermatochalasis
Primary: Graded Change in Dermatochalasis — .2679 units on a scale
Edema
Primary: Number of Participants Who Showed Improvement in Under Eye Swelling and Dark Circles Relative to Baseline Per Intervention — 0; 0 participants — p==1
Perioral Rejuvenation · Upper Lip Projection
Primary: Nasal Tip Projection — 0.601 ratio
Lower Eyelid Entropion
Primary: Change in Lower Eyelid Bags. — 5; 5 Participants
Malar Deficiency
Primary: Blinded Evaluations of First Impression — 7.35 score on a scale
Jowls
Primary: Blinded Physician Jawline Rating Scale (JRS) Assessment on Scale of 0 to 4 at Baseline Versus 4 Weeks After Last Injection. — 2.214; 2.071; 1.857; 1.857 score on a scale…
Moderate to Severe Nasolabial Folds
Primary: Responder Rate in Reduction of Nasolabial Folds — 34; 39; 73 Participants
Lip Rejuvenation
Primary: First Impressions — 46.756; 27.769; 46.391; 34.404 score on a scale
Midface Volume Deficit
Primary: Percentage of Participants With 1 Point Improvement From Baseline on the Medicis Midface Volume Scale (MMVS) as Measured by the Blinded Evaluator at Month 12 — 68.8…
Midface Volume Deficit
Primary: Percent Responders With 1 Point Improvement on the Medicis Midface Volume Scale — 67; 8 Participants
Chin Retrusion
Primary: Percentage of Participants (Responders) With At Least 1-Point Improvement From Baseline on the GCRS, as Assessed by the Blinded Evaluator at Month 6 ([Baseline…
Midface Volume Deficit
Primary: Percentage of Responders — 80; 87.2; 76.7 percentage of subjects
Skin Laxity
Primary: Day 180 Number of Participants With Improvement in Lower Eyelid Area as Determined by a Masked, Qualitative Assessment. — 5 Participants
Nasolabial Fold, Hypoplastic
Primary: NLF-SRS Grade of Nasolabial Folds Change — -1.50 score on a scale
Lid-Parallel Conjunctival Folds
Primary: Lid-Parallel Conjunctival Folds (LIPCOF) — 1.95; 1.75; 1.70; 1.40 Score
Laser · Periorbital
Primary: Change From Baseline in Texture Score at Visit 4 (End-of-study Session) — 0.25; -4.75 score on a scale — p=0.075
Nasolabial Folds in Chinese Population
Primary: Mean Change From Baseline in Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS) at 6 Months — -0.03; 0.03 units on a scale
Wrinkle · Periorbital · Tixel 2
Primary: Percentage of Participants With Safety Adverse Events — 3.92 Percentage of Participants
Volume Loss (Soft Tissue Ptosis or Atrophy )
Primary: Mean Change From Baseline in Volume Loss Assessment — -0.8 Score on a scale