N/A N=35 Ultrasound-guided Peripheral IJ Study
IV Access
Primary: Number of Participants With Successful Cannulation of the Internal Jugular Vein — 34 Participants
Clinical Trial Search
Completed trials with posted results — search by concept, filter by the parameters that matter at the bedside.
N/A N=95 AccuCath™ Intravenous (IV) Device Used by Vascular Access Team (VAT)
Vascular Access Complication
Primary: Percentage of Participants With Successfully Inserted Peripheral IV Catheter Placement on First Attempt — 85.3 percentage of participants
N/A N=217 Central Venous Access Study
Central Line Catheters
Primary: Adherence to Clinical Guidelines for Catheter Interventions and Management — 12; 0; 0; 11 # of catheter-related incidents
N/A N=182 Intraosseous Versus Intravenous Vascular Access During Cardiac Arrest
Cardiac Arrest
Primary: First Attempt Success Rate Between the Tibial IO, Humeral IO, and Peripheral IV. — 26; 17; 58 Participants
N/A N=50 Ultrasound-Guided Peripheral Venous Access Using AccuCath
Intravenous Access
Primary: First Attempt Success Rate — 17; 11 Participants
Phase 1 N=18 EASI Access II --- Follow-up Study to the EASI Access Trial
Disaster Medicine · Difficult Intravenous Access · Dehydration
Primary: Number of Participants With Successfully Placed EASI Lines — 18 Participants
N/A N=22 Intraosseous Access in the Emergency Department for Patients With Failed Attempts at Intravenous Access: A Randomized Trial Examining Resource Utilization and Patient Satisfaction
Difficult Peripheral IV Access
Primary: Time to Successful Placement of a Functioning USGIV/IO — 163.7; 67.3 seconds
N/A N=127 Continuous Intraosseous Vascular Access Over 48 Hours
Intraosseous Vascular Access
Primary: Serious Complications From Intraosseous (IO) Access — 0; 0; 0; 0 Participants
N/A N=248 AccuCath Guidewire Intravenous (IV) Device Versus Conventional IV Catheter In General Nursing Use
Vascular Access Complication
Primary: First Attempt Success Rate With Peripheral IV Catheter Placement — 89; 47 percentage of participants — p=<0.0001
N/A N=100 Technique for Successful Ultrasound-guided Peripheral Vascular Access
Obesity · Vascular Diseases
Primary: Successful First Attempt Peripheral Venous Cannulation — 96 participants
N/A N=220 Comparison of AccuCath IV Catheter and Conventional IV Catheter in Interventional Radiology
Vascular Access Complications
Primary: First Attempt Success Rate With Peripheral IV (PIV) Catheter Placement — 84; 90 Participants
N/A N=119 The Effect of Two Different Tourniquet Techniques on Peripheral IV Access Success Rates
Tourniquet
Primary: Peripheral IV Access Success Rate — 42; 43 Participants — p=0.95
N/A N=212 Ultrasound Guided Vascular Access in Pediatric Intensive Care Patients
Critical Illness
Primary: Central Line Placement Success — 82; 108 participants — p=<0.001
N/A N=146 A Comparison of the Success Rate Of Cannulation Between The Accuvein Apparatus And Standard Technique
Cannulation
Primary: First Attempt Success Rate of Cannulation — 54; 54; 18; 20 Participants — p=.851
N/A N=350 Peripheral Intravenous Catheter Securement With Tissue Adhesive
Vascular Access Devices
Primary: IV Catheter Survival — 66; 55 Participants
N/A N=270 Comparison of Different Techniques on First Attempt Success in Difficult Vascular Access Patients
Vascular Access
Primary: Number of Participants With Success in the First Attempt — 56; 71; 53 Participants
N/A N=330 IN.PACT™ AV Access IDE Study
Arteriovenous Fistula Stenosis · Arteriovenous Fistula Occlusion · Arteriovenous Fistula
Primary: Target Lesion Primary Patency Rate Through 6 Months — 125; 88 Participants — p=<0.001
N/A N=152 Complications Associated With Central Venous Access in the NSICU: PICC vs CVC
PICC · Central Venous Catheter · Central Line
Primary: Participants With Complications With Central Access Including Insertion — 14; 10 Participants — p=0.271
N/A N=184 A Comparison of the First Attempt Success Rate of Cannulation Between the Accuvein Apparatus and Standard Technique
Procedural Complication
Primary: First Attempt Success Rates With the AccuVein 300 Device Versus Standard Method — 92; 92 Participants
N/A N=24 Healthy Adult Volunteer Study of Intraosseous Infusion Using the Sternum
Intraosseous Vascular Access
Primary: Occurrences of Extravasation During Infusion — 2 participants
N/A N=120 Prospective Feasibility Trial of AccuCath 2.25" Blood Control (BC) Placed in Difficult Access Patients in the Emergency Department
Vascular Access Complication
Primary: First Attempt Success Rate — 92 Participants
N/A N=243 Optical Detection of Intravenous Infiltration:A Pilot Study
Infiltration of Peripheral IV Therapy
Primary: Time Infiltration Detected by Nurse — 29.8; 32.3 hours
N/A N=15 Follow-Up Study Validating a Blended Technique to Identify the Proximal Humerus Intraosseous Vascular Access Site
Intraosseous Vascular Access · Vascular Access
Primary: Proximal Humerus Intraosseous (IO) Insertion Site Placement Total Score — 6.0; 1.2; 4.8 units on a scale
N/A N=103 Percutaneous Less Invasive AV Fistula for Vascular Access in ESRD
End Stage Renal Disease · AV Fistula · Fistula
Primary: Maturation Success Rate at 90 Days — 92 Participants
N/A N=20 Intraosseous Pressure Monitoring in Intensive Care Unit Patients
Blood Pressure
Primary: Standardized Ratio as a Percentage Between Mean IOP and Mean Arterial Pressure — 34.5; 40.5; 40.1 percentage of IO pressure to cuff pressu
N/A N=5 Proximal Humerus Site for Anesthesia
Intraosseous Vascular Access
Primary: Intraosseous Infusion Flow Rate — 2433.33 mL / hour
N/A N=270 Ultrasound Guided Catheter Length Survivability
Catheter Complications
Primary: Duration of IV Survival — 92; 136 hours
N/A N=30 Evaluation of the Surfacer System Approach to Central Venous Access
Venous Occlusion
Primary: Number of Participants With Safe Insertion and Patency of Central Venous Access Catheter — 30 participants — p=0.5
N/A N=32 An Innovative Taping Technique for Improved Intravenous (IV) Catheter Securement
Dislodged Catheter · Catheter Related Complication
Primary: The Force (Newtons) Required to Dislodge an IV Catheter Secured in the Retrograde Direction. — 28.65; 15.41; 19.29 Newtons
N/A N=160 Infra Red Vein Visualization: Efficacy vs. Standard Technique
Difficult Intravenous Access
Primary: Success Rate — 84.81; 90 percentage of participants — p=0.34