30 closest matches · ranked by relevance
Glabellar Frown Lines · Canthal Lines
Primary: Responders Rate Using the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) at Maximum Frown (Glabellar Lines) — 100 percentage of participants
Lip Rejuvenation
Primary: First Impressions — 46.756; 27.769; 46.391; 34.404 score on a scale
Perioral Rejuvenation · Upper Lip Projection
Primary: Nasal Tip Projection — 0.601 ratio
Patients With Moderate to Severe Perioral Lines
Primary: Percentage of Participants With at Least a 1 Point Improvement From Baseline on the Perioral Lines Severity Scale (POLSS) — 87; 72 percentage of participants
Perioral Rhytids · Aging · Wrinkle
Primary: Change From Baseline in Perioral Rhytids Severity Rating Scale (PR-SRS) Score Rated by the Blinded Live Evaluator (BLE) at Week 8 After Last Treatment. — 121; 4; 29; 47…
Nasolabial Folds · Marionette Lines · Wrinkles
Primary: Number of Subjects With Naturalness of Expression in Motion (2D Video) — 30 Participants
Lateral Canthal Lines
Primary: Percentage of Subjects With a ≥ 2-grade Improvement From Baseline on the Lateral Canthal Line Investigator and Subject Assessments at Maximum Smile at One Month. — 106…
Peri-oral Wrinkles
Primary: Local and Systemic Adverse Events — 100 percentage of participants
Glabellar Frown Lines
Primary: Number of Responders Using the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS) at Month 1 — 92; 3 Participants — p=<0.001
Glabellar Lines · Lateral Canthal Lines
Primary: Percentage of Subjects Who Achieve Grade/Level 0 or 1 on the GL Investigator Scales at Maximum Frown — 769 Participants
Glabellar Frown Lines (GL) · Lateral Canthal Lines (LCL)
Primary: Percentage of Subjects With a ≥ 2-grade Improvement From Baseline on the Glabellar Lines Investigator and Subject Assessments at Maximum Frown — 0; 75; 78 Participants…
Glabellar Rhytides
Primary: Percentage of Subjects With a ≥ 1-Grade Improvement From Day 1 in the Investigator Assessed Facial Wrinkle Scale of Glabellar Rhytides at Maximum Contraction — 97.1…
Nasolabial Fold, Hypoplastic
Primary: NLF-SRS Grade of Nasolabial Folds Change — -1.50 score on a scale
Glabellar Frown Lines
Primary: Percentage of Subjects With a ≥ 2-grade Improvement From Baseline on the Glabellar Lines Investigator and Subject Assessments at Maximum Frown at One Month. — 165; 0…
Cosmetic Techniques
Primary: Patient Satisfaction With Validated FACE-Q Aesthetics Survey — 28.0; 24.0; 36.0; 36.0 score on a scale
Midface Volume Deficit
Primary: Percent Responders With 1 Point Improvement on the Medicis Midface Volume Scale — 67; 8 Participants
Nasolabial Folds, Wrinkles
Primary: Non-inferiority of the Delta of the WSRS Score Between W24 and Baseline for TEOSYAL® RHA Ultra Deep Versus Perlane-L® for the Correction of Moderate to Severe…
Aging · Pain
Primary: Non-inferiority of RHA® Redensity With New Anesthetic Agent Versus RHA® Redensity With Lidocaine in Terms of Reducing Pain During Device Injection Into the Upper…
Moderate to Severe Nasolabial Folds
Primary: Responder Rate in Reduction of Nasolabial Folds — 34; 39; 73 Participants
Platysma Prominence
Primary: Percentage of Participants With at Least 1-Grade Improvement at Day 14 as Rated by Investigator Using the Clinician Allergan Platysma Prominence Scale (C-APPS) — 12.0…
Cosmetic Techniques
Primary: the Change in Dynamic Strain in the Glabella Area After Injection Over Time — 6.4; 10.9; 6.6; 8.9 percent difference of neutral+dyanamic
Lateral Canthal Lines · Glabellar Lines
Primary: The Percentage of Participants With a ≥ 2-grade Improvement From Baseline on the Facial Wrinkle Scale With Photonumeric Guide (FWS) According to INVESTIGATOR AND…
Volume Loss (Soft Tissue Ptosis or Atrophy )
Primary: Mean Change From Baseline in Volume Loss Assessment — -0.8 Score on a scale
Lateral Canthal Lines
Primary: The Percentage of Participants With a ≥ 2-grade Improvement From Baseline on the Facial Wrinkle Scale With Photonumeric Guide (FWS) According to INVESTIGATOR AND…
Contour
Primary: Percentage of Participants Who Showed ≥ 1-point Jawline Improvement From Baseline on the Allergan Loss of Jawline Definition Scale (ALJDS), as Assessed by the…
Correction of Nasolabial Folds
Primary: Change From Baseline in Average Nasolabial Folds-Severity Rating Scale (NLF-SRS) Grade Based on Investigator Assessment at Week 24 — -1.8 score on a scale
Glabellar Lines · Lateral Canthal Lines
Primary: The Percentage of Participants With a ≥ 2-grade Improvement From Baseline on the Facial Wrinkle Scale With Photonumeric Guide (FWS) — 0; 78; 66 Participants
Nasolabial Folds in Chinese Population
Primary: Mean Change From Baseline in Wrinkle Severity Rating Scale (WSRS) at 6 Months — -0.03; 0.03 units on a scale
Glabellar Lines
Primary: The Percentage of Participants With a ≥ 2-grade Improvement From Baseline on the Facial Wrinkle Scale With Photonumeric Guide (FWS) According to INVESTIGATOR AND…
Nasolabial Folds
Primary: Procedural Pain Score — 2.0; 4.1 units on a scale