Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Climate-driven environmental changes and endocrine-disrupting chemicals may contribute to breast cancer carcinogenesis and progressionClimate change and environmental factors may impact breast cancer risk

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Note that environmental factors and climate-related disruptions may impact breast cancer progression and care continuity.

This narrative review examines the intersection of climate-driven environmental changes and breast cancer. The scope includes factors such as air pollution, wildfire emissions, endocrine-disrupting chemicals, and food system disruptions. The authors synthesize potential mechanisms of carcinogenesis, including oxidative stress, chronic inflammation, immune dysregulation, endocrine perturbation, and epigenetic modification.

Regarding molecular subtypes, the authors suggest that endocrine-disrupting chemicals may have greater relevance to hormone receptor-positive disease, while inflammatory and immune-mediated pathways may influence more aggressive phenotypes. However, the review notes that evidence for specific molecular subtype impacts is currently limited. Additionally, the review highlights how climate-related disasters can disrupt critical clinical pathways, including screening, diagnosis, treatment continuity, and survivorship care.

Clinical practice relevance is focused on the need for integrating oncology into national climate adaptation policies. The authors identify opportunities for green oncology, exposomics, and precision environmental health to build climate-resilient health systems. The findings are presented as potential contributions rather than established causal links, and the review notes that current oncology integration into climate policy is not well-aligned.

How this fits prior evidence

This narrative review addresses gaps in understanding how environmental factors influence breast cancer. It expands on the clinical landscape by identifying how climate-related disasters may disrupt screening, diagnosis, and treatment continuity. While previous evidence has explored specific surgical techniques and the role of sTIL levels in HER2-positive cases, this review focuses on the broader environmental and systemic impacts on oncology care and molecular pathways.

Our environment plays a massive role in our health, but we are only beginning to understand how a changing climate affects cancer. New research highlights how factors like air pollution, wildfire smoke, and chemicals that mimic hormones might contribute to breast cancer. These environmental stressors can cause internal issues like chronic inflammation and stress on the body's cells.

The research also looks at how these factors might affect different types of breast cancer. For example, chemicals that mimic hormones might have a stronger link to certain types of the disease, while inflammation might play a role in more aggressive forms. However, scientists note that evidence for these specific links is still limited.

Beyond the biology, there is a practical side to this issue. Climate-related disasters can physically disrupt a patient's journey, making it harder to get regular screenings, consistent treatment, or steady follow-up care. This highlights a need for healthcare systems to become more resilient so that patients can stay on track even when environmental challenges arise.

What this means for you:
Environmental factors and climate-related disasters may impact both breast cancer risk and the consistency of patient care.

Common questions

How does air pollution or smoke affect breast cancer?

Air pollution and wildfire emissions can cause oxidative stress and chronic inflammation in the body. These processes, along with other environmental factors like pesticide exposure, may contribute to the development of breast cancer by affecting how cells behave and respond to hormones.

Can climate change affect how patients receive treatment?

Yes. Climate-related disasters can cause significant disruptions to the healthcare system. This can make it harder for patients to access regular screenings, receive consistent treatment, or maintain steady survivorship care after their diagnosis.

Do all types of breast cancer react the same to environmental chemicals?

Not necessarily. The research suggests that chemicals mimicking hormones may be more relevant to hormone receptor-positive disease. Meanwhile, pathways involving inflammation and the immune system might have more influence on more aggressive types of breast cancer.

Study Details

Study typeSystematic review
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedSep 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
Climate change is increasingly recognized as a major determinant of human health, yet its implications for breast cancer prevention, progression, and healthcare delivery remain insufficiently integrated into global cancer control strategies. Breast cancer, the most commonly diagnosed malignancy among women worldwide, is influenced by a complex interplay of genetic, hormonal, environmental, and socioeconomic factors, many of which are being reshaped by climate change. This narrative review examines the intersections between climate change, environmental exposures, and breast cancer within the framework of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goal 13 (Climate Action). Current evidence indicates that climate-driven environmental changes—including worsening air pollution, wildfire emissions, endocrine-disrupting chemicals, pesticide exposure, water contamination, and food system disruptions—may contribute to breast carcinogenesis through mechanisms involving oxidative stress, chronic inflammation, immune dysregulation, endocrine perturbation, and epigenetic modification. The review further highlights that susceptibility may differ across molecular subtypes, with endocrine-disrupting chemicals having greater relevance to hormone receptor-positive disease, while inflammatory and immune-mediated pathways may influence more aggressive phenotypes, although subtype-specific evidence remains limited. Beyond biological mechanisms, climate-related disasters disrupt breast cancer screening, diagnosis, treatment continuity, and survivorship care, disproportionately affecting socioeconomically disadvantaged populations through interactions with established determinants of health, including healthcare access, lifestyle factors, and structural inequities. The review critically evaluates the current alignment between SDG 13 and breast cancer control, identifying important gaps in the integration of oncology into national climate adaptation policies while highlighting opportunities for climate-resilient health systems, green oncology, exposomics, artificial intelligence, and precision environmental health.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.