FTO-targeted strategies currently lack clinical evaluation and rely on preclinical evidence for cancer treatmentTargeting the FTO Protein May Improve Cancer Treatment Outcomes in Future Trials

The fat mass and obesity-associated protein (FTO), an RNA demethylase acting on both internal m6;A and cap-proximal m6;Am, functions in cancer as a context-dependent epitranscriptomic regulator whose net effect cannot be reduced to an oncogene–tumor-suppressor dichotomy. Its biological output is shaped by tumor lineage, subcellular localization, upstream signaling, and competing m6;A reader activities, predominantly YTHDF2-mediated decay and IGF2BP-mediated stabilization, although both reader families display additional non-canonical functions and are themselves modulated by post-translational modifications. Building on the now well-established context-dependence of FTO biology, which we do not claim as a novel observation, this review synthesizes current evidence on FTO’s roles at the intersection of tumor immune contexture, immune checkpoint regulation, metabolic reprogramming, and therapeutic resistance. We examine how FTO may contribute to immune exclusion through metabolic competition, exosomal signaling, and stromal reprogramming; modulate PD-L1 expression through direct and indirect mechanisms; and influence response to chemotherapy, targeted therapy, radiotherapy, and CNS-directed treatment. Emerging FTO inhibitors, FTO-degraders, and combination strategies with immune checkpoint blockade, ferroptosis inducers, or glycolytic inhibitors are evaluated against their underlying preclinical evidence base. The contribution of this review lies less in proposing a new framework than in three forms of integration typically addressed in isolation: explicit calibration of mechanistic claims to evidence tier, systematic separation of tumor-intrinsic from immune-cell-intrinsic FTO functions across lymphoid and myeloid compartments, and translation of reader-network biology into biomarker-stratified trial design. Technical limitations of epitranscriptomic methods are addressed as constraints on inference. To our knowledge, no FTO-targeted strategy has yet entered Phase I oncology evaluation; current combination rationales therefore remain preclinically supported rather than clinically established.