This phase 3 randomized controlled trial evaluated AQST-109, a sublingual film, compared to intramuscular epinephrine delivered via manual syringe, EpiPen, or Auvi-Q autoinjector in healthy adults. The study assessed pharmacokinetic parameters over 360 minutes, with primary outcomes including maximum serum concentration and partial area under the curve. Sample size, setting, and publication type were not reported.
For main results, AQST-109's area under the curve and maximum serum concentration (over 60 minutes) exceeded manual intramuscular injection, equalled EpiPen, and was lower than Auvi-Q, though exact numbers and statistical measures were not provided. Time-to-maximum plasma concentration was 12 minutes for AQST-109, faster than 20 minutes for EpiPen, 30 minutes for Auvi-Q, and 50 minutes for intramuscular injection. Blood pressure and heart rate increases were more rapid and larger with AQST-109 than comparators. Repeat doses of AQST-109 showed greater than dose-proportional increases in pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters, exceeding comparators.
Safety data indicated no serious adverse events were reported, but adverse events, discontinuations, and tolerability were not reported. Limitations were not specified, and funding or conflicts were not reported. Practice relevance is not established, as this study focused on pharmacokinetics in healthy adults without clinical anaphylaxis outcomes.
View Original Abstract ↓
BACKGROUND: Intramuscular epinephrine administered via manual injection, autoinjector, or as a nasal spray are the current first-line treatments for anaphylaxis. AQST-109 is a needle- and device-free sublingual alternative epinephrine formulation in late-stage clinical development.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of single dose and repeat doses (RD) of AQST-109 with intramuscular epinephrine in healthy adults.
METHODS: In this 2-part, phase 3, open-label study, participants received single dose and RD of AQST-109 and epinephrine via manual syringe, EpiPen, or Auvi-Q autoinjector on different days. PK and PD parameters were assessed in 360 minutes post-administration; primary end points were maximum serum concentration and partial area under the curve. Additional PK and PD end points including blood pressure and heart rate were also measured.
RESULTS: After single dose AQST-109 administration, area under the curve and maximum serum concentration met the primary end point of PK bracketing of 60 minutes, exceeding that of manual intramuscular injection, equaling EpiPen, but lower than that of Auvi-Q. AQST-109 had a median time-to-maximum plasma concentration of 12 minutes, exceeding that of EpiPen (20 minutes), Auvi-Q (30 minutes), and intramuscular injection (50 minutes); there was also more consistency (narrower IQR) than the comparators. AQST-109 demonstrated more rapid and larger increases in blood pressure and heart rate than the comparators. RD AQST-109 had greater than dose-proportional increases in PK and PD parameters, exceeding the comparators. No serious adverse events were reported.
CONCLUSION: Single dose AQST-109 demonstrated PK exposures consistently bracketed within established levels for approved intramuscular epinephrine and autoinjectors, with a more rapid time-to-maximum plasma concentration and comparable PD responses. These results suggest that AQST-109 represents a safe and effective alternative to injectable epinephrine, which is more portable and needle free.