Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Azithromycin does not reduce severity of wheezing symptoms more than placebo in preschool childrenTrial Shows Azithromycin Does Not Reduce Severity of Wheezing

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Note that azithromycin does not reduce the severity of acute wheezing symptoms more than placebo in preschool children.

This randomized controlled trial enrolled 840 preschool-age children (18 to 59 months) presenting to an emergency department with moderate-to-severe episodes of wheezing. Participants were randomized to receive either azithromycin once daily at a dose of 12 mg per kilogram of body weight for 5 days or a matching placebo for 5 days.

The primary outcome was the sum of scores on the Asthma Flare-up Diary for Young Children (ADYC) over 5 days. In both the positive and negative cohorts, there was no significant difference between azithromycin and placebo (median 9.59 vs. 9.72 in the positive cohort; P = 0.70; median 9.30 vs. 9.10 in the negative cohort; P = 0.69).

A secondary outcome showed higher bacterial clearance in the azithromycin group (58.7%) compared to the placebo group (11.4%). Safety profiles were similar between groups across both cohorts. However, the trial was stopped for futility by the data and safety monitoring board after a planned interim analysis. The results suggest that azithromycin does not lead to a greater reduction in the severity of wheezing-related symptoms than placebo in this population.

How this fits prior evidence

How this fits prior evidence: This finding addresses a gap regarding the use of macrolides for acute respiratory symptoms in children. While previous coverage noted that azithromycin does not raise macrolide-resistant gene prevalence in preterm infants, this study specifically evaluates its efficacy for wheezing symptoms. It also contrasts with findings where other antibiotics like cefdinir or cefprozil were preferred over azithromycin due to inferior efficacy in specific infections like Group A streptococcal pharyngitis.

Researchers conducted a randomized controlled trial to see if the antibiotic azithromycin helped young children with moderate-to-severe wheezing. The study included 840 children between 18 and 59 months old who visited an emergency department for wheezing episodes.

The researchers gave one group of children azithromycin for five days while the other group received a placebo. They measured how severe the symptoms were using a specific diary tool. The results showed no significant difference in symptom severity between the children who took the antibiotic and those who took the placebo.

While the antibiotic did show higher rates of bacterial clearance in some cases, it did not change the overall experience of wheezing for the children. Because the study was stopped early due to a lack of expected results, the findings suggest that azithromycin may not be an effective way to reduce immediate wheezing symptoms in this age group.

What this means for you:
Azithromycin did not significantly reduce the severity of wheezing symptoms in preschool-age children compared to placebo.

Study Details

Study typeRct
Sample sizen = 840
EvidenceLevel 2
Follow-up59.0 mo
PublishedAug 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BACKGROUND: Wheezing illnesses are a leading cause of hospitalization for preschool-age children and are frequently treated with antibiotics. Observational studies have shown more frequent isolation of three pathogenic bacteria (, , and ) from nasopharyngeal samples from children with recurrent episodes of wheezing than from those without such illnesses. METHODS: In this multicenter trial, we randomly assigned patients 18 to 59 months of age who presented to an emergency department with a moderate-to-severe episode of wheezing to receive azithromycin once daily at a dose of 12 mg per kilogram of body weight or matching placebo for 5 days. The primary outcome was the sum of scores on the Asthma Flare-up Diary for Young Children (ADYC) over 5 days. Primary-outcome scores could range from 5 to 35, with higher scores indicating more severe wheezing-related symptoms. Efficacy was assessed separately in patients who tested positive for pathogenic bacteria (the positive cohort) and in those who tested negative (the negative cohort). Secondary outcomes were length of stay in the emergency department, length of hospital stay, and return emergency department visits or hospitalizations within 72 hours. Bacterial clearance and antimicrobial resistance were measured at follow-up visits 1 to 3 weeks after randomization. RESULTS: Among 840 patients who underwent randomization, 521 tested positive for pathogenic bacteria. The trial was stopped for futility by the data and safety monitoring board after a planned interim analysis. ADYC scores did not differ significantly between the azithromycin and placebo groups in either the positive cohort (median, 9.59 [interquartile range, 7.29 to 12.60] vs. 9.72 [interquartile range, 7.66 to 12.17]; P = 0.70) or the negative cohort (median, 9.30 [interquartile range, 6.97 to 11.62] vs. 9.10 [interquartile range, 7.19 to 11.45]; P = 0.69). In the positive cohort, bacterial clearance was 58.7% in the azithromycin group and 11.4% in the placebo group. Secondary outcomes appeared to be similar in the two groups for both cohorts, as did the development of bacterial resistance and the incidence of adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Azithromycin did not lead to a greater reduction in the severity of wheezing-related symptoms than placebo in preschool-age children who presented to the emergency department with moderate-to-severe acute wheezing. (Funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and others; AZ-SWED ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04669288.).
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.