Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Short or extended antibiotic holiday durations do not differ in treatment failure rates for periprosthetic joint infectionShort or long antibiotic breaks show same success for joint infections

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Note that antibiotic holiday duration (<2 weeks vs. ≥2 weeks) does not significantly affect treatment failure rates in PJI.

This meta-analysis investigated the impact of antibiotic holiday duration on treatment failure rates in patients undergoing two-stage exchange arthroplasty for chronic periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) following primary total hip or total knee arthroplasty. The study compared a short duration (<2 weeks) to an extended duration (≥2 weeks).

The meta-analysis reported a treatment failure rate of 18% (95% CI, 0.16 to 0.20) for any duration. Specifically, the failure rate for extended duration was 18% (95% CI, 0.16 to 0.20), and the failure rate for short duration was 18% (95% CI, 0.15 to 0.23). These results suggest no notable difference in treatment failure rates based on the length of the antibiotic holiday.

The authors noted that the evidence is limited by substantial heterogeneity among the studies. Clinical application of these findings should be interpreted with caution due to this heterogeneity. The results suggest that both short and extended antibiotic holidays may be acceptable for managing chronic PJI during two-stage exchange arthroplasty.

How this fits prior evidence

This meta-analysis addresses a gap in optimizing the management of chronic periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). It specifically addresses the role of antibiotic holiday duration in two-stage exchange arthroplasty. While previous coverage noted that one-stage revision shows comparable infection control to two-stage revision, this finding clarifies that if a two-stage revision is chosen, the duration of the antibiotic holiday does not significantly impact the treatment failure rate.

Living with a chronic infection in a replaced hip or knee joint is a grueling experience. When a second surgery is needed to fix the infection, doctors must decide how long to wait before starting the next procedure. This period, often called an antibiotic holiday, is meant to give the body a break from medication before the next stage of treatment.

New data looked at these waiting periods to see if a longer break actually improved outcomes. The analysis compared a short break of less than two weeks against an extended break of two weeks or more. The results showed that both groups had the same treatment failure rate of 18 percent. This means a shorter break did not lead to more failures than a longer one.

While the results are consistent, the evidence is limited by a lot of differences between the studies included in the analysis. Because of these variations, the findings are not definitive. Patients and their doctors should discuss these results to determine the best timing for the next step in treatment.

What this means for you:
Short and long antibiotic breaks show the same success rates for treating chronic joint infections.

Common questions

Does the length of the antibiotic break affect the success of the surgery?

The data shows no notable difference in treatment failure rates between a short antibiotic holiday of less than 2 weeks and an extended holiday of 2 weeks or more. Both groups showed a failure rate of 18 percent. Because of significant differences between the studies studied, the evidence is limited.

What is an antibiotic holiday for a joint infection?

An antibiotic holiday is a period where a patient stops taking antibiotics before undergoing a second surgery to treat a chronic joint infection. This study looked at whether a short break of less than 2 weeks was as effective as a longer break of 2 weeks or more.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
EvidenceLevel 1
Follow-up0.5 mo
PublishedOct 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
INTRODUCTION: Two-stage exchange arthroplasty is commonly used for the management of chronic periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Along with many other aspects of this technique, the optimal duration of antibiotic holiday during the interstage period remains contentious. We aimed to answer this question through a systematic review and meta-analysis by synthesizing evidence from the current literature. METHODS: Systematic review was conducted for studies reporting on two-stage exchange arthroplasty for the management PJI in total hip or total knee arthroplasty (TKA) published between January 1, 2013 and May 1, 2024. The meta-analysis included 14 studies reporting outcomes of two-stage exchange arthroplasty with antibiotic holidays for the treatment of chronic PJI following primary total hip arthroplasty or TKA, and the proportion of failed cases were analyzed using prediction models. RESULTS: The pooled proportion of failed cases across studies of any length for antibiotic holiday was 18% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.16 to 0.20). The proportion of failed cases in studies using an extended duration antibiotic holiday was 18% (95% CI, 0.16 to 0.20) versus 18% (95% CI, 0.15 to 0.23) for studies using a short duration. CONCLUSION: With the number available, the findings identified no notable difference in treatment failure rates with short (<2 weeks) or extended (≥2 weeks) antibiotic holiday duration between the two stages. However, the evidence is limited by substantial heterogeneity among studies, and further studies are necessary to appropriately address this topic.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.