Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Narrative review on ICIs in patients with viral infections and solid tumorsCancer Immunotherapy Works Differently in Viral Infections

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Consider viral reactivation risk when using ICIs in patients with viral infections and solid tumors.

This is a narrative review that synthesizes evidence on the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in patients with viral infections, including hepatitis B virus, hepatitis C virus, human immunodeficiency virus, human papillomavirus, and Epstein–Barr virus, who have solid tumors. The authors discuss how viruses reconfigure tumor immune landscapes, leading to heterogeneity in immunotherapy responses.

Key synthesized findings include potential effects on antitumor immune function, virological responses, and immunological changes suggestive of improved viral control. The review also addresses the risk of viral reactivation and immune-related adverse events (irAEs). However, no specific pooled effect sizes, sample sizes, or comparative outcomes are reported, as this is a qualitative synthesis.

The authors note limitations, including the risk of viral reactivation as a persistent concern. They emphasize the potential value of virus-specific immune profiling to guide individualized treatment strategies and the need to optimize the integration of ICIs with antiviral therapies.

Practice relevance is restrained, focusing on the need for careful patient selection and monitoring. The review does not provide trial-level details on interventions, comparators, or adverse event rates, and it calls for further research to clarify safety and efficacy in this population.

Maria, diagnosed with liver cancer, also lives with hepatitis B. Her doctor paused before prescribing immunotherapy. “It could help your cancer,” he said, “but we need to watch your virus closely.”

She’s not alone. Millions of cancer patients also carry viruses like hepatitis B, hepatitis C, HIV, or Epstein-Barr. And now, science is uncovering how these hidden infections shape treatment outcomes in ways no one expected.

Cancer immunotherapy—especially drugs called immune checkpoint inhibitors—has changed lives. These drugs wake up the immune system to attack tumors. But they don’t work the same for everyone.

One big reason? Hidden viral infections.

They’re more common than you think. Around 37 million people live with HIV. Over 250 million have chronic hepatitis B. Many develop cancer later in life. Until recently, doctors often excluded them from immunotherapy trials over safety fears.

But now, evidence shows these patients can benefit—sometimes in surprising ways.

The immune system is already busy fighting the virus

For years, experts worried: if your immune system is worn out from fighting a long-term virus, can it really take on cancer too?

Viruses like HBV or HIV keep the immune system on high alert for years. This can exhaust T cells—the very cells immunotherapy tries to revive.

It’s like a factory running 24/7 with no breaks. Eventually, workers burn out.

But here’s the twist: in some patients, immunotherapy doesn’t just restart anti-cancer immunity—it also gives the immune system a boost against the virus.

Some people with hepatitis B or HIV have shown lower virus levels after treatment. Their immune systems, once exhausted, begin regaining control.

Think of it like rebooting a frozen computer. The system resets—and suddenly, old problems start resolving.

This doesn’t happen for everyone. But when it does, it’s a double win: cancer slows down, and the virus does too.

Yet not all surprises are good ones.

But there’s a catch

While immunotherapy can help, it also risks waking up sleeping viruses.

In patients with hepatitis B, the virus can suddenly surge—especially if they develop side effects from treatment and need steroids. Steroids calm the immune system, which can let the virus run wild.

The same goes for HIV. Though most patients don’t see viral rebounds, close monitoring is essential.

Even HPV and Epstein-Barr virus play roles. Some cancers caused by these viruses respond better to immunotherapy—likely because the immune system already recognizes virus-related signals in the tumor.

Cervical, head and neck, and some lymphomas fall into this group. For them, the virus might actually make immunotherapy more effective.

When the virus helps the treatment

Doctors are starting to see patterns.

If a cancer is linked to a virus—like HPV causing throat cancer—the immune system may already be primed to respond.

It’s like having a wanted poster up for years. When immunotherapy arrives, the immune system recognizes the enemy faster.

But for non-cancer-related viruses—like hepatitis in a lung cancer patient—the story is more complex. The immune system is distracted, not trained.

Still, new research suggests we might turn this to our advantage.

By testing patients for virus-specific immune activity before treatment, doctors could predict who will benefit—and who’s at risk.

One team reviewed dozens of cases across HIV, HBV, and HCV. They found immunotherapy was generally safe when paired with antiviral drugs.

Most patients didn’t experience viral flare-ups. Some even saw improved viral control.

This doesn't mean this treatment is available yet.

Experts agree: we’re not ready to change guidelines. But we are close to smarter, personalized choices.

The key may lie in timing. Starting antiviral therapy before immunotherapy could protect patients.

For HIV patients on effective medication, risks appear low. Many studies now include them—something rare just five years ago.

Still, gaps remain. Most data come from small studies. Older adults, women, and certain ethnic groups are underrepresented.

And while mice studies help, human immune responses are more complex.

So what should patients do?

If you have cancer and a viral infection, don’t avoid immunotherapy out of fear. But do ask questions.

Talk to your doctor about your viral status. Make sure you’re on antiviral meds if needed. And insist on regular blood tests to monitor virus levels.

The future? Combining immunotherapy with precision immune profiling.

Doctors may soon test not just for cancer markers, but for viral immune activity too. This could guide who gets treated, how, and when.

Clinical trials are now exploring these combinations. Results over the next few years could reshape care for millions.

For now, caution and care go hand in hand. But hope is growing—quietly, steadily—that one treatment might tackle two threats at once.

Study Details

Study typeSystematic review
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized the therapeutic landscape of diverse solid tumors; however, concurrent viral infections significantly influence their efficacy and safety profiles. By driving persistent antigen exposure, inducing T cell exhaustion, and remodeling the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME), viruses extensively reconfigure tumor immune landscapes, leading to marked heterogeneity in responses to immunotherapy. Emerging evidence indicates that patients infected with hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), human papillomavirus (HPV), or Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) who receive ICIs therapy may not only regain antitumor immune function, but in some cases may also be associated with virological responses, immunological changes suggestive of improved viral control. However, the risk of viral reactivation remains a concern, particularly in the context of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) requiring immunosuppressive treatment. This review systematically summarizes the current clinical application of ICIs across different viral infection backgrounds and highlights recent advances in the underlying immunological mechanisms. Furthermore, we propose the potential value of virus-specific immune profiling in guiding individualized treatment strategies and emphasize the need to optimize the integration of ICIs and antiviral therapies from the perspective of systemic immune reprogramming.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.