Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Meta-analysis on SPG acupuncture for allergic rhinitis quality of life and symptom scores

Meta-analysis on SPG acupuncture for allergic rhinitis quality of life and symptom scores
Photo by Ayanda Kunene / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Consider SPG acupuncture as a possible adjunct for allergic rhinitis, noting low-quality evidence and high heterogeneity.

This is a meta-analysis of studies on sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) acupuncture for allergic rhinitis. The review synthesized data from 732 patients, comparing SPG acupuncture to conventional acupuncture, sham, or medications. The primary outcomes were changes in the Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ), Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS), and total effective rate.

The authors found that SPG acupuncture improved RQLQ scores (MD = 7.63, 95% CI: 2.81 to 12.45, P = 0.002) and reduced TNSS scores (MD = 2.23, 95% CI: 0.92 to 3.55, P = 0.0009). The total effective rate was increased (RR = 1.17, 95% CI: 1.06 to 1.29, P = 0.002). No improvement was observed for IgE (P = 0.23).

The authors noted significant limitations, including high heterogeneity for RQLQ (I2 = 89%) and TNSS (I2 = 83%), and low-quality evidence for these outcomes. The evidence for total effective rate was moderate quality. Safety data were not reported.

The authors concluded that SPG acupuncture may be a viable adjunct therapy for allergic rhinitis. However, they cautioned that the evidence quality remains low to moderate and high heterogeneity limits certainty. Practice relevance should consider these limitations.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedMay 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BackgroundAllergic rhinitis (AR) imposes a significant global health burden. While conventional treatments include medications and immunotherapy, acupuncture at the sphenopalatine ganglion (SPG) has emerged as a promising alternative. This meta-analysis evaluates the efficacy of SPG acupuncture for AR.MethodsWe searched CNKI, PubMed, Web of Science, SinMed, and Cochrane Library (inception to May 2024) for RCTs comparing SPG acupuncture against controls (conventional acupuncture/sham/medications). Primary outcomes were Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) change, Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) change, and total effective rate. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane criteria. Meta-analyses used random/fixed models in RevMan 5.3; evidence quality was graded via GRADE.ResultsEleven RCTs (= 732) were analyzed. SPG acupuncture significantly: Improved RQLQ (MD = 7.63, 95% CI: 2.81 to 12.45, P = 0.002; low-quality evidence).Reduced TNSS (MD = 2.23, 95% CI: 0.92 to 3.55, P = 0.0009; low-quality evidence).Increased total effective rate ((RR = 1.17, 95% CI: 1.06 to 1.29, P = 0.002; moderate-quality evidence).No IgE improvement was observed (P = 0.23). Heterogeneity was high for RQLQ (I2 = 89%) and TNSS (I2 = 83%).ConclusionEleven RCTs with a total of 732 participants were analyzed. SPG acupuncture improves quality of life, nasal symptoms, and clinical efficacy in AR patients vs. conventional treatments, though evidence quality remains low to moderate. It represents a viable adjunct therapy, warranting further high-quality trials.SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATIONhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.