Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Ambient cold exposure is associated with increased cardiovascular mortality across diverse geographic and socioeconomic settingsCold Weather Exposure Linked to Higher Cardiovascular Mortality Rates

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Note that ambient cold exposure is associated with increased cardiovascular mortality across various global settings.

This narrative review synthesizes 26 epidemiological studies to examine the relationship between ambient cold exposure and cardiovascular mortality in the general population. The review focuses on various geographic and socioeconomic settings, including the US, Norway, and Thailand. The authors conclude that temperatures below county-specific minimum mortality thresholds are associated with approximately 6.3% of cardiovascular deaths. Furthermore, temperatures below city-specific optimum levels are associated with 11.4% of cardiovascular deaths (95% CI 6.0-15.4%).

A specific analysis of cold-wave-related cardiovascular mortality showed a relative risk of 1.076 (95% CI 1.061-1.090). The authors note that these findings represent associations only, and no causal attribution was undertaken. The synthesis is qualitative, and no formal quantitative pooling or ranking of regional vulnerability was performed.

Several limitations are noted, including heterogeneous study designs, exposure definitions, lag structures, and outcome measures. Additionally, there is limited evidence from many warm-climate and lower-resource settings. No consistent quantitative gradient in vulnerability by climatic setting, latitude, or socioeconomic context could be established. Clinical practice relevance was not reported.

How this fits prior evidence

This narrative review addresses a gap in understanding environmental factors affecting cardiovascular health. While previous coverage has identified risk factors such as elevated plasma TMAO levels and the potential of phytomedicines to curb cardiovascular injury, this review focuses on the impact of ambient temperature. It provides a broader context for environmental triggers of cardiovascular mortality, though it does not offer specific data on the efficacy of interventions like exercise-based telerehabilitation or dietary modifications.

A review of 26 different studies looked at how cold weather affects heart health. The researchers looked at people across many different countries and locations, including the United States, Norway, and Thailand. They specifically looked at how temperatures below certain levels related to deaths from cardiovascular disease.

The findings showed that deaths from heart issues increased when temperatures dropped below specific local minimums. Specifically, there was an 11.4 percent increase in cardiovascular deaths when temperatures were below the city-specific optimum. During cold waves, the risk of heart-related death was also found to be higher.

It is important to note that these findings show a link, not a direct cause. The data comes from many different types of studies, which makes it hard to see a clear pattern based on where people live or their income. Because the evidence is based on a narrative review of varied studies, the results should be viewed as a general overview of the relationship between cold and heart health.

What this means for you:
Research shows a link between cold weather and higher cardiovascular mortality, but more consistent data is needed.

Common questions

How does cold weather affect heart health?

The review of 26 studies found a link between cold weather and higher cardiovascular mortality. Specifically, deaths were higher when temperatures fell below city-specific optimums. During cold waves, the risk of heart-related death was also found to be higher. These findings suggest that extreme cold may put more stress on the cardiovascular system.

Is there a specific risk during cold waves?

The data shows a specific link during cold waves. The study reported a relative risk of 1.076 for cardiovascular mortality during these events. This means that during periods of extreme cold, the risk of heart-related death was found to be higher than during normal conditions.

Does the risk change based on where a person lives?

The study looked at many locations, including the US, Norway, and Thailand. However, the researchers could not find a consistent pattern of risk based on a person's specific climate, location, or socioeconomic status. Because the studies were so different, it is hard to say exactly how much risk varies by region.

Study Details

Study typeSystematic review
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedSep 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
Ambient cold exposure has been associated with increased cardiovascular mortality worldwide, but effects vary across climatic and socioeconomic settings. This narrative review synthesizes epidemiological evidence on geographic variation in cold-related cardiovascular mortality and considers environmental, biological, and societal factors that may contribute to the observed patterns. We conducted a narrative review of epidemiological studies investigating associations between ambient cold exposure and cardiovascular mortality. Climatic setting and socioeconomic context were considered as separate analytical dimensions, using local temperature distributions, seasonal patterns, study-specific cold definitions, income classification, housing and heating conditions, healthcare accessibility, and other contextual characteristics where relevant. Because study designs, exposure definitions, lag structures, outcomes, and effect measures were heterogeneous, the synthesis was qualitative; no formal quantitative pooling, causal attribution, or direct ranking of regional vulnerability was undertaken. Evidence suggests that cold-related cardiovascular mortality varies across climatic and socioeconomic settings. Among 26 epidemiological studies contributing to the regional synthesis, substantial heterogeneity was observed in study design, population coverage, temperature metrics, cold definitions, lag structures, covariate adjustment, analytical approaches, outcomes, and effect measures. Methodological credibility was considered qualitatively rather than through a formal risk-of-bias score, with greater interpretive weight given to large multi-location, nationwide, or within-country studies applying standardized or internally consistent analytical frameworks. Illustrative reported estimates included approximately 6.3% of cardiovascular deaths attributable to temperatures below the county-specific minimum mortality temperature in a US analysis, 11.4% (95% CI 6.0–15.4%; lag 0–14 days) attributable to temperatures below the city-specific optimum temperature in a seven-city Norwegian analysis, and a cold-wave-related cardiovascular mortality RR of 1.076 (95% CI 1.061–1.090; lag 0–3 days) in a nationwide Thai study. Because exposure definitions, lag structures, analytical approaches, outcomes, and effect measures differed substantially among studies, no consistent quantitative gradient in vulnerability by climatic setting, latitude, or socioeconomic context could be established. The qualitative evidence suggests that regional patterns may reflect a combination of climatic conditions, biological susceptibility, behavioral responses, socioeconomic circumstances, housing and heating conditions, healthcare capacity, population-level adaptive capacity, and methodological differences. Their relative contributions cannot be determined from the available evidence, and evidence from many warm-climate and lower-resource settings remains limited.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.