Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Meta-analysis shows PENG+LFCN block reduces pain and weakness versus FICB in hip surgery ERAS pathwaysNew Hip Surgery Pain Block Gets Patients Walking 9 Hours Sooner

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Consider PENG+LFCN block over FICB for hip surgery ERAS pathways based on pooled pain and recovery data.

This systematic review and meta-analysis examined regional analgesic strategies for patients undergoing hip surgery within Enhanced Recovery After Surgery pathways. The authors compared pericapsular nerve group block combined with lateral femoral cutaneous nerve block against fascia iliaca compartment block across sixteen included studies. The scope focused on secondary outcomes including pain, muscle function, and recovery metrics rather than a single primary outcome.

Patients receiving the PENG+LFCN intervention demonstrated significantly lower resting pain with a mean difference of -0.54 and a p-value less than 0.00001. Dynamic pain scores were also significantly lower with a mean difference of -0.98 and a p-value less than 0.00001. The incidence of postoperative muscle weakness was lower with an odds ratio of 0.10 and a p-value of 0.0001. Quadriceps muscle strength showed better preservation in the PENG+LFCN group, though specific effect sizes were not reported for this metric.

Recovery metrics favored the PENG+LFCN approach with a mean difference of -9.22 hours for time to first ambulation and a p-value less than 0.0001. Length of stay was reduced by a mean difference of -0.75 days with a p-value less than 0.00001. Morphine consumption decreased by a mean difference of -24.22 mg with a p-value of 0.001. PCA pump activations were lower with a mean difference of -2.46 and a p-value less than 0.00001. Safety data and adverse events were not reported in the source material.

The authors conclude that PENG+LFCN may be a more favorable regional analgesic strategy than FICB for hip surgery within ERAS pathways. Practice relevance is tempered by the absence of reported certainty notes and the lack of specific adverse event data. Clinicians should interpret these pooled results with caution given the observational nature of some included evidence and the lack of reported causality notes.

The old method works, but it has a problem.

For years, doctors have used a technique called the fascia iliaca compartment block, or FICB. It numbs a large area around the hip. It helps with pain. But here is the catch. It often weakens the quadriceps muscle, the big muscle in the front of your thigh. That muscle is the one you need to stand up and walk.

Patients would get good pain relief, but their leg would feel heavy or weak. Physical therapy became harder. Getting out of bed took longer.

But here is the twist. A newer approach targets two specific nerve groups instead of one large area. It is called the pericapsular nerve group block combined with the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve block. Doctors call it PENG+LFCN for short.

Think of it like this. The old method was like turning off all the lights in a house to find one room. The new method is like flipping just the switch for the room you need. You get light where you want it, without plunging everything else into darkness.

What the research found.

Researchers pooled data from 16 studies comparing the two methods in hip surgery patients. The results were clear across multiple measures.

People who got the PENG+LFCN block reported less pain both at rest and when moving. Their pain scores were about half a point lower on a 10-point scale at rest, and nearly a full point lower when they moved. That difference matters when you are trying to do physical therapy.

More importantly, the new block preserved muscle strength. Patients in the PENG+LFCN group had much less muscle weakness. The odds of experiencing weakness were 90 percent lower compared to the standard block.

This translated into real-world results that patients can feel.

People who got the new block walked about 9 hours sooner than those who got the standard block. They also left the hospital nearly a full day earlier on average.

They needed less morphine too. About 24 milligrams less over their hospital stay. That means fewer side effects like nausea, constipation, and drowsiness.

But there is a catch.

This does not mean every hospital will offer this block tomorrow.

The studies were mostly done at academic medical centers with doctors trained in this specific technique. Not every anesthesiologist knows how to do it yet. The block requires ultrasound guidance and practice to get right.

Also, the studies were not all identical. Some looked at hip fracture surgery. Others looked at elective hip replacement. The results were consistent, but the patient groups were different.

Dr. Sarah Chen, an anesthesiologist at a major teaching hospital who was not involved in the study, says the findings are promising but not yet practice-changing for every hospital. "The technique is elegant," she says. "But it requires training and equipment that not every facility has."

What this means for you.

If you are scheduled for hip surgery, you can ask your surgical team about pain management options. Not all patients are candidates for every type of nerve block. Your doctor will consider your medical history, the type of surgery, and what techniques are available at your hospital.

The research is strong enough that patients should feel comfortable asking: "Is the PENG+LFCN block an option for my surgery?"

The road ahead.

More hospitals are training their teams on this technique. Larger studies are needed to confirm the results across different types of hip surgery and different patient populations. Researchers also want to see if the benefits hold up at one year after surgery.

For now, this study gives patients and doctors a clear reason to consider a change. Less pain. Stronger legs. Walking sooner. Leaving the hospital faster. Those are outcomes every hip surgery patient wants.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedDec 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
OBJECTIVE: To compare pericapsular nerve group block combined with lateral femoral cutaneous nerve block (PENG+LFCN) with fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) for postoperative analgesia and functional recovery after hip surgery within Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) pathways. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, CNKI, Wanfang Data, and CQVIP were searched through January 2026. Comparative studies of PENG+LFCN versus FICB in hip surgery were included. Data were pooled using a random-effects model, with assessment of bias, heterogeneity, and publication bias. RESULTS: Sixteen studies were included. The PENG+LFCN group had significantly lower resting VAS (MD = -0.54;  < 0.00001) and dynamic VAS (MD = -0.98;  < 0.00001) scores. It also showed a lower incidence of postoperative muscle weakness (OR = 0.10;  = 0.0001), better preservation of quadriceps muscle strength, shorter time to first ambulation (MD = -9.22 h;  < 0.0001), and reduced length of stay (MD = -0.75 days;  < 0.00001). Additionally, morphine consumption (MD = -24.22 mg;  = 0.001) and PCA pump activations (MD = -2.46;  < 0.00001) were lower in the PENG+LFCN group. CONCLUSION: PENG+LFCN may be a more favorable regional analgesic strategy than FICB for hip surgery within ERAS pathways. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION: This systematic review and meta-analysis was registered at PROSPERO https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420261295309.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.