Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Palliative care consultation increases do-not-resuscitate orders and decreases healthcare utilization in cardiac arrest and cardiogenic shock patientsPalliative care linked to better choices for cardiac arrest patients

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Note associations between palliative care and increased DNR orders or decreased utilization in cardiac arrest and shock.

This narrative review focuses on the role of palliative care for patients with cardiac arrest and cardiogenic shock and their caregivers within an inpatient setting. The publication does not report a specific sample size or numerical effect sizes for the outcomes discussed. The authors synthesize findings indicating that palliative care consultation is associated with increased rates of do-not-resuscitate orders and withdrawal of life-sustaining treatments. Conversely, the review notes associations with decreased healthcare utilization and decreased costs. The authors state that these are associations rather than proven causal effects. The review does not report specific adverse events or tolerability data for the intervention. The authors identify major palliative care research gaps in measurement, equity, education, and delivery models. They also note that patient- and caregiver-centered outcomes have not been adequately studied in this context. The review aims to guide clinicians, researchers, and policymakers in addressing these identified gaps.

This narrative review looks at how palliative care affects patients with cardiac arrest and cardiogenic shock. The study covers patients and their caregivers in inpatient settings. It found that palliative care was linked to more do-not-resuscitate orders and more withdrawal of life-sustaining treatments. Healthcare use and costs also decreased when palliative care was involved. These results show a connection between palliative care and these outcomes. No safety concerns were reported because the review did not track specific adverse events. The authors note that patient-centered outcomes have not been studied enough. Major gaps exist in how palliative care is measured and delivered. Clinicians, researchers, and policymakers should use this review to guide their work. Readers should remember that this is a review and not a trial. The evidence shows links but does not prove cause and effect. More research is needed to fill the gaps in care delivery and equity.

What this means for you:
Palliative care is linked to more do-not-resuscitate orders and lower costs for cardiac arrest patients.

Study Details

Study typeSystematic review
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedJun 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
IntroductionCardiac arrest and cardiogenic shock are life-threatening cardiovascular emergencies that impose substantial physical, psychological, and decisional burdens on patients and caregivers. Palliative care, defined as holistic, person-centered care focused on preventing and relieving symptoms and stressors of serious illnesses to improve quality of life for patients and caregivers, is increasingly recognized as an essential component of comprehensive cardiovascular care.ObjectivesWe therefore conducted a narrative review to synthesize current evidence regarding inpatient palliative care in cardiac arrest and cardiogenic shock; identify critical gaps in research and practice; and propose future directions to guide clinicians, researchers, and policymakers, while centering patients and caregivers.DiscussionIn the U.S., palliative care utilization for patients with cardiac arrest and cardiogenic shock has increased significantly over the last two decades. However, the literature on palliative care in cardiac arrest and cardiogenic shock is limited, demonstrating that palliative care consultation is associated with increased do-not-resuscitate orders and withdrawal of life-sustaining treatments, as well as decreased healthcare utilization and subsequent costs. However, patient- and caregiver-centered outcomes have not been studied. Major palliative care research gaps exist in measurement, equity, education, and delivery models, including the optimal roles of generalist vs. specialist palliative care. Future research should prioritize patient- and caregiver-centered outcomes, comparative effectiveness of different palliative care delivery models, implementation science, health equity, and education and training of generalist palliative care skills to optimize palliative care integration for cardiac arrest and cardiogenic shock to improve the lived experience of these patients and their caregivers.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.