Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

PEEP Valve in Bag-Valve-Mask CPR for Cardiac Arrest OutcomesNew trial plans to test airway pressure during cardiac arrest

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
This protocol tests if adding PEEP to bag-valve-mask ventilation during CPR improves neurological outcomes in cardiac arrest.

This research protocol describes a multicenter randomized controlled trial evaluating the effect of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) during bag-valve-mask ventilation on neurological outcomes in adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients. The study will enroll 2,400 adults who require advanced airway management and manual positive-pressure ventilation during CPR.

Participants will be randomized to receive either a bag-valve-mask system with a PEEP valve set at 8 cm H2O or a sham valve providing zero end-expiratory pressure (ZEEP). The primary outcome is the difference in neurological status at hospital discharge, measured by the utility-weighted modified Rankin Scale.

Secondary outcomes include return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), 30-day survival, and quality of life at 6 months. The trial is conducted across multiple ambulance services, aiming to determine whether PEEP improves outcomes compared to standard care.

As this is a protocol, results are not yet available. The findings could inform ventilation strategies during CPR and potentially improve survival and neurological recovery in OHCA patients.

How this fits prior evidence

How this fits prior evidence: This study addresses a gap in current knowledge regarding specific ventilation techniques during cardiac arrest. While previous coverage noted that manual pressure augmentation did not improve survival to hospital discharge in shockable OHCA, and standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation improves survival rates in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, the specific impact of PEEP valves on neurological outcomes remains to be determined by this trial.

When someone suffers a cardiac arrest outside of a hospital, every second counts. Doctors often use advanced airway management to help the patient breathe while performing CPR. A new study is being designed to see if adding a specific type of pressure can improve the chances of patients recovering their physical and mental abilities after the event.

The trial will involve 2,400 adults who need advanced airway management during resuscitation. Researchers plan to compare two methods: one using a bag-valve-mask with a PEEP valve to provide 8 cm H2O of pressure, and another using a sham valve that provides zero pressure. The main goal is to see if the added pressure leads to better neurological outcomes when patients are discharged from the hospital.

It is important to note that this study is currently in the protocol stage. This means the trial has not been conducted yet, and results are not available. While the study aims to improve care for those in critical condition, we must wait for the data to see if this specific technique makes a difference.

What this means for you:
A new large-scale trial will test if extra air pressure during CPR improves recovery after cardiac arrest.

Common questions

What is the goal of this new study?

The trial aims to determine if adding a specific amount of pressure (8 cm H2O) using a PEEP valve during CPR improves neurological outcomes for patients who have suffered an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. The researchers want to see if this method helps patients have better physical and mental functions when they leave the hospital.

Is this treatment already available for patients?

No, results are not yet available because this is a research protocol. This means the study design has been created, but the trial has not been conducted yet. We cannot know if it improves outcomes until the 2,400 patients in the planned study are treated and evaluated.

Study Details

Study typeRct
Sample sizen = 2,400
EvidenceLevel 2
PublishedJul 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
Rationale: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) aims to provide oxygen to vital organs through chest compressions and ventilations, until return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) is achieved. A major barrier to effective oxygenation during CPR is atelectasis, which impairs gas exchange and results in hypoxemia -- a condition strongly associated with decreased rates of ROSC and worsened neurological outcomes. Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is routinely used in critical care to prevent atelectasis and improve oxygenation. During CPR, however, its use is inconsistent and subject of debate. This reflects long-standing theoretical concerns that PEEP may reduce venous return, lower cardiac output, and impair the chances of successful defibrillation. However, emerging experimental and observational data suggest that PEEP may actually improve oxygenation, cardiac output, oxygen delivery, and rates of ROSC during CPR. We hypothesize that applying PEEP during CPR improves neurologically favorable survival. Given its simplicity, negligible cost, and widespread availability, PEEP has the potential to enhance outcomes from cardiac arrest in a scalable and resource-efficient manner. Objective: To determine whether, during CPR with manual ventilation and after placement of a supraglottic airway device (SAD) or endotracheal tube (ETT), using a valve that generates 8 cm H2O PEEP compared with a sham valve providing zero end-expiratory pressure (ZEEP) improves neurological outcomes at discharge. Study design: The REVIVE-PEEP trial is an investigator-initiated, pragmatic, registry-based, multicenter, parallel-group, triple-blind randomized controlled superiority clinical trial in the ARREST registry. Study population: The target population consists of adult patients with an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) in whom advanced airway management is initiated, defined by placement of a SAD or ETT, followed by manual positive-pressure ventilation during CPR. As randomization occurs at the start of CPR, initiation of advanced airway management is considered an intercurrent event and is used to define the modified intention-to-treat analysis population. Blinding ensures that analyses within this subset provide an unbiased estimate of the principal stratum estimand. The target sample size for the mITT subset is 2,400 patients. Intervention: Participating ambulance services will use pre-assembled, 1:1 pre-randomized CPR kits containing a bag-valve-mask system with either a PEEP valve (8 cm H2O) or a sham valve (0 cm H2O; ZEEP), alongside standard advanced life support. The same resuscitator bag will be used throughout the resuscitation, both before and after advanced airway management. Main study parameters/endpoints: The primary estimand is the difference in neurological outcome at hospital discharge, assessed by the utility-weighted modified Rankin Scale within the mITT subset. Key secondary outcomes include ROSC, 30-day survival and quality of life at 6 months.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.