Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Furosemide plus hypertonic saline linked to lower biomarker increases after saline load in ADHFStudy in 200 heart failure patients compares two intravenous diuretic treatment approaches

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Note: Biomarker changes with furosemide+HSS in ADHF are surrogate findings; clinical relevance is unknown.

This randomized controlled trial enrolled 200 consecutive patients with acute decompensated heart failure due to heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Patients received either intravenous furosemide plus small volumes of hypertonic saline solution (HSS) or intravenous furosemide alone. Biomarkers were evaluated at admission (T0), after treatment (T1), and after a saline bolus (T2).

The study found that at T1, absolute delta values of IL-6, hsTnT, NT-proBNP, and galectin-3 were higher in patients treated with high-dose furosemide plus HSS, though specific numbers were not reported. However, the increase in serum concentrations of IL-6, hsTnT, sST2, galectin-3, and NT-proBNP after the saline load (T2) was significantly lower in the group receiving furosemide plus HSS. The expression of miR181b also decreased more significantly in subjects treated with furosemide plus HSS compared to furosemide alone.

Safety and tolerability data, including adverse events and discontinuations, were not reported. The study's key limitation is that all measured outcomes are surrogate markers of inflammation, remodelling, and epigenetic regulation; no clinical efficacy or safety outcomes were assessed. The practice relevance is unclear as the intervention's effect on symptoms, hospital stay, or mortality remains unknown. The findings suggest a potential biological effect on specific pathways but do not support changes to current clinical management.

Researchers studied 200 patients hospitalized with acute heart failure due to a weakened heart muscle. They wanted to see if adding a small amount of concentrated salt water (hypertonic saline solution) to a standard intravenous diuretic (furosemide) would affect certain blood markers differently than the diuretic alone. The study measured markers related to inflammation, heart stress, and a specific genetic signal (miR181b).

The main finding was that patients who received the diuretic plus the saline solution showed smaller increases in several inflammation and stress markers (IL-6, hsTnT, sST2, galectin-3, and NT-proBNP) after receiving a saline load. They also had a greater decrease in the genetic marker miR181b compared to those who got the diuretic alone.

It is very important to understand what this study did not show. The measured outcomes were only lab values, or 'surrogate markers.' The researchers did not report whether patients actually felt better, left the hospital sooner, or had fewer complications. They also did not report on safety or any side effects of the treatments. No information was given about what happened to patients after the short study period.

Readers should view this as early research looking at biological signals. The results suggest the combination treatment might affect certain pathways differently, but it is far too soon to know if this makes any real-world difference for patients. More research is needed to see if these lab changes translate into better health outcomes.

What this means for you:
Early study shows lab marker differences with two IV treatments for heart failure; real patient benefits and safety are unknown.

Study Details

Study typeRct
Sample sizen = 1
EvidenceLevel 2
PublishedMar 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
AIMS: In a randomised controlled trial (RCT), we compared the effects of treatment with furosemide + small volumes of hypertonic saline solution (HSS) with those of furosemide alone in patients with decompensated heart failure (HF), and their effects on inflammatory and remodelling markers and epigenetic signatures. METHODS: All consecutive patients with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) due to heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) were enrolled. Patients were randomly assigned to treatment with i.v. furosemide plus HSS or i.v. furosemide alone. Patients were evaluated at T0 (admission), T1 (after treatment), and T2 (after a saline bolus) to determine serum concentrations of NT-proBNP, hsTnT, s-ST2, galectin-3, IL-6, and CRP and to evaluate some selected miRNA concentrations. RESULTS: We enrolled 200 subjects, 107 randomized to the furosemide plus HSS, and 93 to furosemide alone. At T1, patients treated with high-dose furosemide + HSS had higher absolute delta values of IL-6, hsTnT, NT-proBNP and galectin-3. Patients treated with i.v. furosemide + HSS showed significantly lower increases in the serum concentrations of IL-6, hsTNT, sST2, galectin-3 and NT-proBNP after saline load. We observed a decrease in miR181b expression in subjects treated with i.v. furosemide plus HSS in comparison to patients treated with i.v. furosemide alone and a more significant reduction of miRNA181b expression in subjects treated with furosemide plus HSS. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings revealed that in subjects with ADHF, treatment with i.v. furosemide plus HSS significantly decreased the serum levels of IL-6, sST2, hsTnT, galectin-3, and NT-proBNP and modulated some miRNA expression.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.