Deferral of PCI non-inferior to routine PCI before TAVI in coronary artery disease patients
This randomised controlled trial involved 466 patients with coronary artery disease undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) across 12 hospitals in the Netherlands. Participants were assigned to either deferral of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or routine PCI before TAVI, with follow-up of 12.0 months. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, and major bleeding at 1 year.
Main results showed deferral of PCI was non-inferior to PCI before TAVI for the primary endpoint, with a rate difference of -1.7% (95% CI -9.5 to 6.2) and hazard ratio of 0.89 (95% CI 0.62-1.28). Specifically, 56 (24%) of 233 patients in the deferral group experienced the composite outcome compared to 60 (26%) of 233 in the PCI group. Non-inferiority was established with p=0.0008, but superiority was not shown (p=0.68).
Safety and tolerability data were not reported in the input. Limitations were not specified, but the study design supports causal inference within its context. Funding was from ZonMw.
Practice relevance suggests an initial conservative strategy with PCI deferral can be appropriate in selected patients, though patient-tailored treatment decisions remain essential. Clinicians should interpret these findings in light of individual patient factors and await further evidence on long-term outcomes and safety.