Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Intrinsic capacity score predicts rehospitalization risk after PCI in CAD patients

Intrinsic capacity score predicts rehospitalization risk after PCI in CAD patients
Photo by Joshua Chehov / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Consider the intrinsic capacity score as an accessible predictor of cardiovascular rehospitalization after PCI in CAD patients, noting the association is not yet established for prognosis.

This retrospective cohort study evaluated the prognostic value of an intrinsic capacity (IC) score, assessed within 48 hours of admission, in patients with coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. The primary outcome was all-cause rehospitalization, with secondary outcomes including cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular rehospitalization.

Compared to an IC score of 0, an IC score of 4 was independently associated with an increased risk of all-cause rehospitalization (HR = 3.07, 95% CI 1.89–5.00) and cardiovascular rehospitalization (HR = 5.23, 95% CI 2.30–11.89). The IC score was not a significant predictor of non-cardiovascular rehospitalization. A linear positive relationship was noted between IC score and hazard, with a cutoff of 2.5. The predictive performance for all-cause rehospitalization had an AUC of 0.692 (95% CI: 0.664–0.729).

Safety and tolerability data were not reported. A key limitation is that the prognostic value of the IC score in this population had not been established prior to this study. The practice relevance notes that the IC score is an accessible, independent, and robust predictor of cardiovascular rehospitalization after PCI in CAD patients, but the evidence shows association, not causation.

Study Details

Study typeCohort
EvidenceLevel 3
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BackgroundIntrinsic capacity (IC) has shown potential in predicting health outcomes in older adults. However, its prognostic value in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has not been established.MethodsIn this retrospective cohort study, patients with CAD undergoing PCI were included. IC score was assessed within 48 h of admission using a structured nurse-administered questionnaire. The primary outcome was all-cause rehospitalization. Secondary outcomes included cardiovascular rehospitalization and non-cardiovascular rehospitalization. Kaplan–Meier analysis, Cox proportional hazards models, and restricted cubic spline (RCS) were used to estimate the relation between IC score and rehospitalization. Subgroup analysis and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to assess predictive performance.ResultsA higher IC score, indicating poorer IC, was independently associated with increased all-cause rehospitalization risk (HR = 3.07 for IC = 4 compared with IC = 0, 95% CI 1.89–5.00) and cardiovascular rehospitalization risk (HR = 5.23 for IC = 4 compared with IC = 0, 95% CI 2.30–11.89). Subgroup analyses showed that this relationship remained consistent across lesion morphologies and revascularization strategies. In contrast, IC score was not a significant predictor of non-cardiovascular rehospitalization. RCS curves showed the linear positive relationship between IC score and HR of cardiac rehospitalization with the cutoff of 2.5. ROC curve for all-cause rehospitalization showed IC score with the AUC of 0.692 (95% CI: 0.664–0.729).ConclusionIC score is an accessible, independent, and robust predictor of cardiovascular rehospitalization after PCI in CAD patients.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.