Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Meta-analysis of 13 trials finds SGLT2 inhibitors reduce heart failure hospitalization in myocardial infarction.

Meta-analysis of 13 trials finds SGLT2 inhibitors reduce heart failure hospitalization in myocardial…
Photo by Ayanda Kunene / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Consider SGLT2 inhibitors for myocardial infarction patients to reduce heart failure hospitalization, noting incomplete safety data.

This publication is a meta-analysis evaluating the effects of sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors in patients with myocardial infarction. The scope encompasses 13 randomized controlled trials with a total sample size of 22,238 patients. The intervention involved SGLT2 inhibitors combined with conventional therapy compared against conventional therapy alone. The review synthesizes evidence regarding cardiovascular and safety endpoints. Evidence was pooled to determine overall treatment effects.

The primary outcome analysis indicates a significant reduction in the incidence of hospitalization for heart failure. The reported effect size is a relative risk of 0.76 with a 95% confidence interval of 0.68–0.84. Secondary outcomes assessed included all-cause mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events, left ventricular ejection fraction, N-terminal pro-B type natriuretic peptide, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. These metrics provide a comprehensive view of clinical impact and safety.

Several points regarding data availability are noted in the source text. Follow-up duration was not reported, and the p-value for the primary outcome was incomplete. Safety results, including renal dysfunction, hepatic dysfunction, urinary tract infection, and glycemia-related adverse events, were assessed but results were not reported in the abstract. Limitations were not reported in the provided text.

Clinicians should interpret these findings within the context of the reported limitations. While the meta-analysis is based on randomized controlled trials, the absence of complete safety and follow-up data requires caution. Further information is needed to fully assess tolerability and long-term outcomes. Clinical decisions should weigh these incomplete data carefully against potential benefits and risks.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedApr 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
BackgroundSodium–glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) have been shown to improve clinical outcomes in patients with heart failure; however, their efficacy and safety in patients with myocardial infarction, particularly when used in addition to conventional therapy, remain controversial. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the effects of adding SGLT2i to conventional therapy on clinical outcomes in patients with myocardial infarction through a systematic review and meta-analysis.MethodsWe conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the effects of conventional therapy with or without SGLT2i on clinical outcomes in patients with myocardial infarction. PubMed, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and Embase were systematically searched.The primary outcome was the incidence of hospitalization for heart failure. Secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), N-terminal pro-B type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). Safety outcomes comprised renal dysfunction, hepatic dysfunction, urinary tract infection, and glycemia-related adverse events. All analyses were conducted using a random-effects model. Prespecified subgroup analyses for the primary outcome were performed according to the presence or absence of type 2 diabetes mellitus, timing of SGLT2i initiation, and specific SGLT2i agent.ResultsThis meta-analysis included 13 randomized controlled trials involving 22,238 patients with myocardial infarction. Compared with conventional therapy alone, treatment with SGLT-2i significantly reduced the incidence of hospitalization for heart failure (RR = 0.76, 95% CI 0.68–0.84, p 
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.