Systematic review and meta-analysis finds high VTE incidence in stroke patients and moderate model performance
This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk prediction models in stroke patients. From 2,726 retrieved records, seven prediction models were included. The pooled VTE incidence across studies was 20.8% (95% CI: 14.7%–27.0%), with individual study incidences ranging from 9.8% to 38.9%. The pooled area under the curve (AUC) for model performance across six models was 0.87 (95% CI: 0.81–0.93), with individual AUC values ranging from 0.781 to 0.978.
All seven included models were judged to be at high overall risk of bias according to the PROBAST tool. Notably, none of the models underwent independent external validation, which limits their generalizability. The authors highlight these limitations and note that the results should be interpreted with caution.
The review provides a reference for future model development and clinical research, but the high risk of bias and lack of external validation mean that current models are not yet ready for routine clinical use. Further validation in diverse stroke populations is needed before these tools can be recommended for practice.