Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

Qiliqiangxin reduces cardiovascular events in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction across LVEF subgroups

Qiliqiangxin reduces cardiovascular events in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction across…
Photo by Justin Morgan / Unsplash
Key Takeaway
Consider that qiliqiangxin reduced cardiovascular events consistently across LVEF subgroups in HFrEF patients in this post hoc analysis.

This is a post hoc analysis of the Phase 3 QUEST randomized controlled trial. The population included 3110 patients with symptomatic heart failure and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤40%, with a subgroup of n=482 having LVEF ≤25%. The intervention was qiliqiangxin added to guideline-directed therapy, compared to placebo or standard care.

The main finding was that the effect of qiliqiangxin on the primary outcome (cardiovascular death or first heart failure hospitalization) was consistent across LVEF categories. Hazard ratios were 0.91 [0.64-1.30] for LVEF ≤25%, 0.65 [0.47-0.89] for >25-30%, 0.94 [0.71-1.26] for >30-35%, and 0.71 [0.55-0.91] for >35%. The primary outcome rate was 25.4 per 100 patient-years for LVEF ≤25% and 18.7-19.8 for higher LVEF groups. Interaction P-values were Pinteraction = .28 for LVEF categories and Pinteraction = .45 for continuous LVEF.

Safety was consistent across LVEF categories, but serious adverse events, discontinuations, and detailed tolerability were not reported. Key limitations include the post hoc nature of the analysis and limited use of sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors. The practice relevance is that qiliqiangxin reduced cardiovascular events consistently across the LVEF range in HFrEF patients, but this is an observational association for lower LVEF and outcomes.

This is an RCT, so intervention effects are causal; the lower LVEF association is observational from multivariable adjustment. Effect sizes and CIs are reported for the primary outcome, and interaction P-values indicate consistency across subgroups. Do not infer mechanisms beyond reported data or recommend without full trial context.

Study Details

Study typeRct
Sample sizen = 482
EvidenceLevel 2
PublishedMay 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
AIMS: Qiliqiangxin (QLQX), a Chinese traditional medicine, improved outcomes in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) when added to guideline-directed therapy. As treatment effects in heart failure (HF) may vary with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), this post hoc analysis of the QUEST (Qiliqiangxin in Heart Failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality) trial examined whether baseline LVEF modified the efficacy and safety of QLQX. METHODS: QUEST randomized 3110 patients with symptomatic HF and LVEF ≤40%. The primary outcome was cardiovascular death or first HF hospitalization. Baseline LVEF was categorized as ≤25% (n = 482), >25-30% (n = 692), >30-35% (n = 829), and >35% (n = 1107). RESULTS: Mean LVEF was 32% (median 33%, interquartile range 28%-37%). Patients with LVEF ≤25% had the highest rate of the primary outcome (25.4 per 100 patient-years), while rates were similar across higher LVEF groups (18.7-19.8). After multivariable adjustment, lower LVEF was independently associated with higher risks of the primary outcome and mortality. The effect of QLQX on the primary outcome was consistent across LVEF categories (hazard ratio [95% CI] from the lowest to highest: 0.91 [0.64-1.30], 0.65 [0.47-0.89], 0.94 [0.71-1.26], and 0.71 [0.55-0.91], respectively; Pinteraction = .28), and as a continuous variable (Pinteraction = .45). Similar results were observed for individual components and total HF hospitalizations (all Pinteraction > .10). The safety of QLQX was also consistent across LVEF categories. CONCLUSION: In patients with HFrEF, lower LVEF was associated with worse cardiovascular outcomes. QLQX reduced cardiovascular events consistently across the range of LVEF examined in QUEST, despite the limited use of sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors. CHICTR REGISTRATION: ChiCTR1900021929.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.