If you have stable coronary artery disease, you're likely on medications to manage cholesterol and blood pressure. But what if a simple, inexpensive anti-inflammatory drug could also help protect your arteries? A new study tested exactly that. Researchers gave 72 patients with proven heart disease either a low daily dose of colchicine or a placebo for one year, on top of their standard care. They used special heart scans to measure plaque in the arteries before and after. The results were mixed. The drug did not significantly reduce the volume of a specific, high-risk type of plaque called low attenuation plaque. However, it did make a meaningful difference in the total amount of plaque clogging the arteries, known as percent atheroma volume. Patients taking colchicine had less total plaque growth after a year compared to those on the placebo. The drug was well-tolerated with no major safety issues. This means that for people already managing their heart disease, adding colchicine might help slow down the overall progression of atherosclerosis, offering another layer of defense.
Colchicine reduces total plaque burden but not low attenuation plaque in stable CAD patientsCan a cheap anti-inflammatory drug slow heart disease? It might help reduce plaque buildup
AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work
The EKSTROM trial was a prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial investigating whether colchicine (0.5 mg/day) as an adjunct to standard care affects coronary plaque components in patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD). The study enrolled 84 patients with proven CAD (via angiography, CT angiography, or CAC >400) who were randomized to colchicine or placebo for 12 months. The primary outcome was the rate of change in low attenuation plaque (LAP) volume measured by serial coronary CT angiography. The secondary endpoint was total plaque percent atheroma volume (PAV%). Of the 84 enrolled, 72 participants (mean age 64.6 ± 7.3 years, 88% male) completed the study. Baseline demographics, risk factors, medications, vitals, and inflammatory markers were not significantly different between groups, except the colchicine group had higher baseline use of hypertension medications (75% vs 44%). For the primary outcome, there was no significant difference in the change in total LAP between the colchicine group (median [IQR] 0.1 [-0.2, 0.2]) and placebo (0.0 [-0.2, 0.3]), with an unadjusted P = 0.342. Multivariable models adjusting for CV risk factors and baseline LAP also showed no significant difference. For the secondary outcome, follow-up total PAV at 12 months was significantly lower in the colchicine group (median [IQR] 0.3 [-0.1, 1.3]) compared to placebo (1.4 [0.4, 2.6]), with an unadjusted P = 0.008. In multivariate models, colchicine treatment remained associated with lower PAV at 1 year (P = 0.015). The study noted trends toward regression in non-calcified and fibro-fatty plaque. Inflammatory markers were reduced with colchicine but did not achieve statistical significance. Colchicine was well tolerated with no major safety concerns.