Mode
Text Size
Log in / Sign up

IL-17 inhibitors rank highly for clearance of scalp, nail, and palmoplantar psoriasisBiologics Show Different Success Rates for Scalp and Nail Psoriasis

AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review. How we work

Key Takeaway
Note that secukinumab, bimekizumab, and ixekizumab rank highly for clearance of difficult-to-treat psoriasis sites.

This network meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy of several biologics targeting the IL-17/IL-23 axis, including secukinumab, bimekizumab, ustekinumab, ixekizumab, brodalumab, and guselkumab, for patients with scalp, nail, and palmoplantar psoriasis. The analysis utilized SUCRA rankings to determine the relative performance of these agents in achieving complete or near-complete clearance.

Key findings indicate that secukinumab ranked highest for palmoplantar psoriasis (79.7%), followed by bimekizumab (72.2%) and ustekinumab (69.7%). For nail psoriasis, bimekizumab (78.9%) was ranked first, followed by ixekizumab (77.2%) and brodalumab (67.5%). In scalp psoriasis, brodalumab (88.7%) and ixekizumab (86.9%) were ranked highest, with bimekizumab (69.0%) and guselkumab (65.1%) following.

Several limitations affect the certainty of these results. Evidence for nail psoriasis is characterized as low-certainty. The estimate for brodalumab in scalp psoriasis was based on a single contributing study, and there was local inconsistency regarding the ixekizumab-placebo comparison. Clinicians should consider these uncertainties, along with long-term response and patient factors, when selecting treatments.

How this fits prior evidence

This meta-analysis extends prior evidence regarding secukinumab for moderate to severe plaque psoriasis and its association with improved skin response in patients with psoriatic arthritis. It also provides comparative data for other IL-17 inhibitors like bimekizumab and ixekizumab, which showed consistent rankings across multiple sites. While brodalumab was previously noted for palmoplantar pustulosis, this analysis specifically addresses its ranking among biologics for scalp and nail psoriasis.

Researchers analyzed data from nearly 6,000 patients to compare how different biologic medications perform against placebo. The study looked specifically at three difficult-to-treat areas: the scalp, the nails, and palmoplantar sites (the palms of the hands and soles of the feet).

The results showed that different drugs performed better depending on where the psoriasis was located. For example, secukinumab ranked highest for clearing palmoplantar psoriasis. Bimekizumab and ixekizumab were noted for having consistently favorable rankings across all three types of sites. However, some findings had less certainty, such as the data regarding nail psoriasis or specific results for brodalumab on the scalp.

Because these results come from a complex network analysis with some limited data points, they should not be used to make medical decisions alone. Factors like long-term response and individual patient needs are also very important. Patients should talk to their doctor to choose the best treatment based on their specific symptoms and health history.

What this means for you:
Different biologics show varying success rates for scalp, nail, and palmoplantar psoriasis sites.

Common questions

Which medication worked best for palmoplantar psoriasis?

In this study, secukinumab ranked highest for achieving complete or near-complete clearance of palmoplantar psoriasis. It was followed in ranking by bimekizumab and ustekinumab.

Are there different results for scalp and nail psoriasis?

Yes, the rankings varied by location. For nail psoriasis, bimekizumab ranked first. For scalp psoriasis, brodalumab and ixekizumab were ranked highest. Some evidence for these specific areas was noted as having lower certainty.

Which medications showed consistent results across all sites?

The study found that bimekizumab and ixekizumab showed consistently favorable rankings across the scalp, nails, and palmoplantar sites. These are both biologics targeting the IL-17/IL-23 axis.

Study Details

Study typeMeta analysis
EvidenceLevel 1
PublishedJul 2026
View Original Abstract ↓
Scalp, nail, and palmoplantar psoriasis are termed “difficult-to-treat sites” owing to their unique anatomical features and therapeutic resistance, substantially impairing patient quality of life. Although anti-IL-17 and anti-IL-23 biologics are widely used, head-to-head comparative evidence for achieving high-level lesion clearance at these specific sites remains limited. Following PRISMA-NMA guidelines, we systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and other databases from inception through November 2025 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Primary outcomes were defined as complete or near-complete clearance. Frequentist network meta-analysis was performed to calculate odds ratios (ORs), with treatment rankings derived from surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) values. Twenty-four RCTs involving 5,946 patients and eight biologics plus placebo were included. For palmoplantar psoriasis, secukinumab ranked highest (SUCRA = 79.7%), followed by bimekizumab (72.2%) and ustekinumab (69.7%). For nail psoriasis, bimekizumab ranked first (78.9%), followed by ixekizumab (77.2%) and brodalumab (67.5%); however, local inconsistency for the ixekizumab–placebo comparison and low-certainty evidence warrant caution. For scalp psoriasis, brodalumab (87.7%) and ixekizumab (86.9%) ranked highest, followed by bimekizumab (69.0%) and guselkumab (65.1%); the brodalumab estimate relied on a single contributing study. During induction-phase follow-up, IL-17 inhibitors tended to rank highly for complete or near-complete clearance at difficult-to-treat psoriasis sites. Bimekizumab and ixekizumab showed consistently favorable rankings across sites, but treatment selection should consider certainty of evidence, sensitivity analyses, long-term response, and patient-level factors. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO, identifier CRD420251271255.
Free Newsletter

Clinical research that matters. Delivered to your inbox.

Join thousands of clinicians and researchers. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.