This meta-analysis examined the effects of adjunctive SGLT2 inhibitor therapy compared to insulin-based therapy without SGLT2i in a population of 6,731 patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus. The scope included assessment of fracture risk, glycemic parameters, body weight, blood pressure, and specific safety indices such as diabetic ketoacidosis and genital tract infections. Follow-up duration was not reported in the provided data.
Key synthesized findings demonstrate that adjunctive SGLT2i therapy is associated with significantly improved glycemic control, reduced body weight, and reduced blood pressure. Regarding fracture risk, the analysis found no significant association, with an odds ratio of 0.98 and a 95% CI of [0.63-1.51]. However, the safety profile reveals concerning increases in specific adverse events. The risk of diabetic ketoacidosis increased with an odds ratio of 3.52 (95% CI [2.16-5.71]), and the risk of genital tract infections increased with an odds ratio of 3.69 (95% CI [2.85-4.78]).
The authors note that while metabolic benefits are clear, the elevated risks for ketoacidosis and infections must be weighed carefully. No specific limitations or funding conflicts were reported in the source text. Clinicians should interpret these pooled estimates conservatively, recognizing that the evidence reflects observational synthesis rather than a single randomized trial. Practice relevance suggests that while SGLT2 inhibitors may offer metabolic advantages, vigilant monitoring for ketoacidosis and infections is essential in this patient population.
View Original Abstract ↓
BACKGROUND: Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), a novel class of antihyperglycemic agents, have raised concerns regarding bone safety. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the specific effect of adjunctive SGLT2i therapy on fracture risk in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM).
METHODS: We systematically searched four databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science Core Collection) to identifyall eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating SGLT2i as adjunctive therapy to insulin in T1DM. Fracture risk was defined as primary outcome, while glycemic parameters, non-glycemic outcomes, and other safety index serving as secondary endpoints. Pooled ORs (95% CIs) were calculated, with dose-stratified subgroup analyses. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration Risk-of-Bias tool (RoB 2).
RESULTS: Our analysis included 10 RCTs comprising 6,731 T1DM patients. All included studies were deemed to be at low or moderate risk of bias. Pooled analysis revealed no significant association between SGLT2i use and fracture risk (OR 0.98, 95% CI [0.63-1.51]). This null finding remained consistent across subgroup analyses. Fracture odds ratios in the low-, moderate-, and high-dose subgroups were 0.78 (95% CI [0.11-5.58]), 1.08 (95% CI [0.55-2.11]), and 0.90 (95% CI [0.50-1.63]), respectively. SGLT2i significantly improved glycemic control, including HbA1c, fasting plasma glucose, and time in range. It also reduced body weight and blood pressure. However, SGLT2i treatment increased the risk of diabetic ketoacidosis (OR 3.52, 95% CI [2.16-5.71]) and genital tract infections (OR 3.69, 95% CI [2.85-4.78]).
CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis provides reassuring evidence that adjunctive SGLT2 inhibitor use is not associated with increased fracture risk in insulin-treated patients with T1DM patients. Nonetheless, the substantially elevated risks of diabetic ketoacidosis and genital tract infections necessitate vigilant clinical monitoring and risk mitigation strategies to ensure safe use of these agents.