Home›Diabetes & Endocrinology› Systematic review and meta-analysis on LH-active gonadotropins for ovarian stimulation in infertility
Systematic review and meta-analysis on LH-active gonadotropins for ovarian stimulation in infertilityAdding LH-active hormone to fertility treatment doesn't boost live births
Frontiers in MedicinePublished April 22, 2026DOI ↗Editorial oversight: Dr. Amelia Tan, PhD · Internal Medicine & Chronic Disease
AI-generated summary of the cited source, checked by automated accuracy review.
How we work
Share
Key Takeaway
Consider that adding LH-active gonadotropins to rFSH shows little difference in live birth but may slightly reduce oocytes retrieved.
This is a systematic review and meta-analysis of 56 randomized controlled trials including 14,034 women undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation. The authors synthesized evidence on adding gonadotropins with LH activity (±rFSH) compared to recombinant FSH alone for infertility treatment.
Key findings show little to no difference in live birth (RR = 1.07, 95% CI 0.96–1.18, 17 studies) and ongoing pregnancy (RR = 1.03, 95% CI 0.95–1.12, 19 studies). Oocytes retrieved per woman showed a slight reduction (MD = −0.50, 95% CI −0.88 to −0.12, 46 studies, I² = 81.1%). Evidence for metaphase II oocytes per woman is very uncertain (MD = −0.49, 95% CI −0.93 to −0.05, 30 studies, I² = 86%). Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) probably does not increase (RR = 0.80, 95% CI 0.61–1.03, 19 studies).
Limitations noted include subgroup differences by downregulation protocol, ovarian reserve, and age, and the need for more studies in specific populations. Certainty of evidence ranges from moderate for live birth, ongoing pregnancy, and OHSS to low for oocytes retrieved and very low for MII oocytes.
Practice relevance is restrained; the benefit–risk balance may favor adding LH-active gonadotropins for OHSS prevention, but results are associations from pooled data, not direct causation.
If you're undergoing fertility treatment, you might wonder whether adding a hormone called LH to your drugs makes a difference. This large review of 56 trials involving over 14,000 women found that adding LH-active drugs to standard fertility treatment didn't meaningfully improve live birth or ongoing pregnancy rates. The chance of having a baby was essentially the same whether LH was added or not. The review also found a slight reduction in the number of eggs retrieved, and the evidence on mature eggs was very uncertain. Importantly, adding LH probably doesn't increase the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS), a potentially serious complication where the ovaries overreact to stimulation. The certainty of the evidence ranged from moderate for birth and pregnancy outcomes to low or very low for egg counts. Because the studies varied in how they were done, the results might not apply equally to everyone, and more research is needed for specific groups.
What this means for you:
Adding LH to fertility drugs doesn't boost pregnancy chances but may slightly lower egg yield.
BackgroundLuteinizing hormone (LH) activity plays a crucial role in follicular development, endometrial decidualization, and embryo implantation. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of gonadotropins with LH activity versus recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (rFSH) for controlled ovarian stimulation (COS).MethodsWe included randomized clinical trials (RCTs) assessing gonadotropins with LH activity with or without rFSH versus rFSH, or comparing different sources of LH activity, or different doses. Participants were women undergoing COS. The outcomes were live births, ongoing pregnancies, oocytes recovered per woman, metaphase II (MII) oocytes per woman, and occurrence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). We searched the MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL databases. We calculated the mean differences (MDs) and risk ratios (RRs) for continuous and dichotomous outcomes, respectively.ResultsWe included 56 RCTs with 14,034 women. The evidence of gonadotropins with LH activity (±rFSH) when compared with rFSH alone probably results in little to no difference in live birth (RR = 1.07, 95%CI = 0.96–1.18; 17 studies, moderate certainty of evidence) and ongoing pregnancy (RR = 1.03, 95%CI = 0.95–1.12; 19 studies, moderate certainty of evidence), may result in a slight reduction in the number of oocytes retrieved (MD = −0.50, 95%CI = −0.88 to −0.12, I2 = 81.1%; 46 studies, low certainty of evidence), and is very uncertain in the number of MII oocytes (MD = −0.49, 95%CI = −0.93 to −0.05, I2 = 86%; 30 studies, very low certainty of evidence). However, it probably does not increase OHSS compared with rFSH alone (RR = 0.80, 95%CI = 0.61–1.03, I2 = 17.1%; 19 studies, moderate certainty of evidence). Subgroup analysis by downregulation protocol, ovarian reserve, and age showed some differences in the effects between the compared groups.ConclusionsThe evidence of gonadotropins with LH activity (±rFSH) when compared with rFSH alone probably results in little to no difference in live birth and ongoing pregnancy. However, there is a slight reduction in the number of oocytes retrieved. Moreover, they are safer than rFSH alone because they probably do not increase OHSS. Therefore, based on our review, the benefit–risk balance favors the addition of an LH-active gonadotropin for the prevention of OHSS. More studies are needed to determine the effects in specific populations.Systematic Review Registrationhttps://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD42024572731, identifier CRD42024572731.