Bayesian network meta-analysis compares tirzepatide, liraglutide, and semaglutide for weight reduction in adults without diabetes
This is a Bayesian network meta-analysis that synthesized evidence from a systematic literature review of 42 randomized controlled trials, with six trials included in the final network. The scope was to compare the efficacy of tirzepatide (5, 10, and 15 mg) against liraglutide (3 mg) and semaglutide (2.4 mg) for weight reduction outcomes in adults without type 2 diabetes who have obesity or overweight with at least one obesity-related complication.
The authors found that tirzepatide 10 mg and 15 mg showed statistically greater percentage weight reduction versus liraglutide, with effect sizes of -12.86% and -13.95% respectively. Versus semaglutide, tirzepatide 10 mg and 15 mg also showed statistically greater improvements, with effect sizes of -4.85% and -6.26% respectively. For waist circumference, tirzepatide 10 mg and 15 mg demonstrated statistically greater reductions versus liraglutide (-11.79 cm and -12.30 cm) and versus semaglutide (-4.81 cm and -5.32 cm).
Improvements in triglycerides and diastolic blood pressure were statistically greater with tirzepatide versus liraglutide. For other glycaemic, lipid, and blood pressure parameters, improvements were generally comparable between tirzepatide and both comparators. The authors noted a stringent heterogeneity assessment as a limitation.
The analysis did not report adverse events, serious adverse events, or discontinuations, but noted that all interventions had a comparable safety profile. The authors emphasize that the network meta-analysis reports associations and does not support causal inferences. Practice relevance is restrained given the limited number of trials in the network and the lack of reported safety data.